Date: 16.3.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 759
Buy-an-essay-online.ukessays.xyz #Types of research proposals

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Types of research proposals

Types of research proposals

Mar/Mon/2018 | Uncategorized





Types of Proposals | Research | Michigan Technological University

Types of research proposals

Write My Paper For Me -
Research Proposals | WebGURU

California Bar Exam: Free Workshop! Thank you for following the Bar Exam Guru blog! We have now had over 960,000 views of the Bar Exam Guru Blog! I am humbled and grateful for your following! If you are taking the of research proposals February 2018 bar exam, you will not want to relationship thesis miss out on our upcoming free, “How to of research Pass the California Bar Exam” Workshop on romeo text response essay, November 20, 2017 from types of research 7:00 pm to 9:30 pm. This session will be held in australia Los Angeles. Class fills up quickly, so be sure to reserve your space as soon as possible.

Students will receive a free copy of our Guide to Passing the California Bar Exam as well as free bar exam writing templates. The workshop will provide substantive coverage on types of research, how to successfully write for the California bar examiners. Get answers to when and response essay questions, where you should include California distinctions, how long is types of research proposals, a typical passing essay answer, learn the proper form and structure of australia vision, a solidly passing essay. And, as time allows, we will discuss strategies for the new, 90 Minute Performance Test and the MBEs. Come and learn how to develop a plan for succeeding on the February 2018 bar exam. Types Of Research! Space is limited. A Good Essay! Reserve your spot today! California Bar Exam Predictions The Detail. ***Please be sure to read my earlier post: California Bar Exam Predictions The Short List before reading this post. Types Of Research! Also, please understand that my enrolled students who have paid for our courses, expect to receive this information early and as a result, I do not post until closer to the bar exam.

Remember, I do not claim to be able to Professional Development-Education predict what will be tested on the bar exam. Types Of Research Proposals! Below are simply expanded details for the topics that made the Short List. And Juliet Text Essay! These essay scenarios are worth thinking about types, as it is likely that some of it will be tested. In particular, it can be useful, just from a confidence/psychological standpoint to review possible essay scenarios as a way to get your brain thinking in the right mode and being open to possible areas of testing. CRIMINAL LAW/Murder possibly crossed with Criminal Procedure Not many are predicting Criminal Law or Criminal Procedure. Vision! This is likely because Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure were both just tested on types, the February 2017 bar. However, Criminal Law was tested only lightly (an entrapment issue) and there was no testing of the essay the psychology of infidelity 6th or 8th Amendments.

It has been several years since the types bar examiners have tested murder. Criminal Law has been tested fairly heavily over the years. But, murder has been absent from the essays for nearly ten years now. Typically murder is tested in essay vision conjunction with Criminal Procedure, but can also be tested with other topics or alone. Note: the most recent testing of Criminal Procedure and Criminal Law on the February 2017 exam tested 4th and types proposals, 5th Amendment in conjunction with a criminal law entrapment issue. The last time Criminal Procedure was tested prior to the February 2017 bar exam, was the July 2015 bar exam and it was virtually all 4th Amendment (again, leaving 6th and 8th Amendments untested). So, while Criminal Procedure has been tested recently, we have not seen much testing of the 6th amendment in reflection essay some time and types of research, it has been even longer since we have seen testing of the 8th Amendment (death penalty issues, right to bail, cruel and unusual punishment, sentencing as a separate penalty phase). Training Institute! As a result, I do think that if you were to see Criminal Law Murder, that there is types, a good likelihood that it could be paired up with the 6th and/or 8th Amendments.

Of course, you may not see Criminal Law or Criminal Procedure. But, testing of Criminal Law Murder on the essays is long overdue, so I am still leaning towards this possibility. Be prepared for it! More on Criminal Procedure . . . should it show up at all on the essays . A Good Reflection! . . Types Of Research! One of the areas that has not been tested in institute in delhi a very long time are 6th Amendment jury issues (for example, peremptory challenges, race based challenges, Batson v. Kentucky challenge, challenges based upon belief against or opposition to types of research proposals the death penalty and 8th Amendment bail and cruel and unusual punishment issues). Specifically with cruel and unusual punishment, the bar examiners have not tested the rules regarding capital punishment in many years. This is an creative, easy area, but if and when tested, students are often unprepared because it is such a small part of most examinees#8217; outlines. So be aware! Be sure to review these areas.

A few additional areas where I would put a bit more effort are: the four tests for insanity defense (see below), and accomplice liability and how it relates to the imposition of the death penalty in felony murder cases (imposition of the death penalty is limited to defendants who were #8220;major contributors#8221;). Obviously, the proposals latter will only come up in the context of a felony murder exam with the death penalty but just keep this in mind. Romeo And Juliet Response! You will want to be able to point out this limit on types of research proposals, the imposition of the essay australia vision death penalty should it come up. Insanity Defense: In addition, know the four tests for the insanity defense this has not been tested in Criminal Law for a very long time. This typically comes up (when it does come up) as a defense in a murder essay. Types! It does not get tested often, but has not been tested in many years on a Criminal Law essay, so know the four tests for insanity. By the way, if you do get tested on insanity defenses just knowing that there are four tests is important. You will get credit for telling the bar grader that: #8220;there are four tests for insanity.#8221; Also, you don#8217;t have to be perfect with respect to essay these rules (although you should certainly try to be, it is types proposals, not what we see (perfect rules) in the released answers. Instead the focus is on issue spotting and resolving the issues. Of course the rules are important.

But, my point is that they do not have to be perfect. Just write, just explain and show that you understand what is going on, why something is or isn#8217;t an issue and do your best to creative writing training in delhi resolve it. Criminal Law alone is types of research, just as likely as a cross over with Criminal Procedure or another topic. Essay Of Infidelity! If you were to get a Criminal Law essay alone (no cross-over with Criminal Procedure or anything else) then you want to recognize that there will be more to it than what you see in types proposals Criminal Law exams that are cross-overs. For example, you are more likely to see issues with respect to inchoate liability (solicitation, attempt and conspiracy).

As a result, you need to be very clear on relationship thesis, these rules and clear as to which merge into the large offense (solicitation and attempt) and which does not merge (conspiracy). In addition, with respect to conspiracy, be sure to know the types of research proposals minority and majority views this is key and it is addressed in the Bar Exam Cram Sheet. You may also be more likely to have to discuss criminal law defenses in more detail if you are being tested on Criminal Law alone. PROPERTY Possibly Landlord/Tenant. If property is tested you should be aware that LandLord/Tenant is one of the most common areas for the psychology of infidelity, testing. Other favorite areas for types of research, testing in Property are the areas of relationship, joint tenancy and tenancy in common (when there is types, a severance of the joint tenancy ) and the rights among co-tenants with respect to recovering rents, profits and essay, as well as who has to of research pay taxes and #8220;carrying costs#8221; with respect to the property. Finally, something that has been a trend in recent years is to test some of the more minutia based areas of property that were traditionally mostly reserved for the MBEs. Romeo And Juliet Text Essay Questions! Examples of of research, this are: fee simple absolute (easy, just know the language here and what it means), future interests (yes, it is showing up on the essays three times now in the past few years) and another favorite has been restraints on alienation.

See the first page of the Property Bar Exam Cram Sheet for this coverage. Thesis! And, as always, one of the types best ways to prepare for creative in delhi, any subject is to see and review past bar essays in that topic. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Dormant Commerce Clause or 1st Amendment and. Alert: ALWAYS know Article III Case or Controversy Requirements of: State Action, Standing, issue must be Ripe, not Moot and not involve a Political Question. If you were to see Constitutional Law, the following areas are my favorites for this round: 1) Dormant Commerce Clause or. 2) Possibly the First Amendment speech, religion or association (speech is one of the types more heavily tested areas.

If you were to a good essay get association, it is typically part of a Constitutional Law exam that tests other areas as well as association is types of research, a pretty short issue typically. Be aware that Freedom of Association can also be crossed over with other First Amendment issues). COMMUNITY PROPERTY Possible Value Enhanced Separate Property Owned Business. Look out for Van Camp and Pereira accounting methods. This comes up when there is a separate property business that increases in value . Also be on the look out for relationship thesis, testable areas of: personal injury award, time rule for types of research, determining community property interest of pension, retirement or reimbursement for education or license. Always be on the look out for thesis, transmutation issues.

Community Property was last tested on the July 2016 bar exam. The best way to prepare for types proposals, Community Property is to review past exams. The Psychology Of Infidelity! Beware of how the bar examiners test transmutations in Community Property. Most often, when the of research proposals California bar examiners expect you to discuss transmutations, it is when there really isn#8217;t a valid transmutation but, they want you to Professional bring it up and dismiss it. This is tested on the essays virtually every bar round. Some bar rounds it has even been tested on more than one essay in the same bar round.

In past bar rounds (where the bar examiners tested Professional Responsibility twice on types proposals, the same bar round) it was split over day one and day three. Relationship! Obviously, there is proposals, no day three now. So, could the bar examiners test a topic more than once all in Professional Development-Education day one? Yes, they could. Professional Responsibility, Contracts, Remedies and of research proposals, Evidence are all topics that have shown up on essay the psychology, multiple essays within the proposals same bar round. So be aware of this. It is not necessarily what I am leaning towards, but be aware that they can truly test anything and in creative training institute fact, have tested even the same subject (especially professional responsibility) more than once on the same bar exam. Of Research Proposals! While anything in Professional Responsibility is fair game, the areas that have not been tested in some time include: the attorney advertising rules, rules on perjury and rules for turning over thesis evidence for example a gun, or the whereabouts of a gun, given to attorney by client. Be sure to be able to note the ABA Rules and California distinction here.

All of this being said, do not overlook the most commonly tested areas of Professional Responsibility (the duties, in particular duty to types of research proposals avoid conflicts and Development-Education, the duty of loyalty). What else could come up in Professional Responsibility? Professional Responsibility in proposals the context of a corporation was tested not long ago (July 2016). This could come up again (because truly, the bar examiners can test anything). But, what might be more likely is an essay that deals with an attorney assisting a non-attorney in essay australia vision the unlicensed practice of law . This has been a favorite area of testing. Proposals! If you have something like this it will be in the context of a lawyer going into business with a non-lawyer in australia a way that provides legal services OR a lawyer who is sharing profits with a non-lawyer . If you see either of these situations, you should call it out as a problem. It would not only create an issue with respect to types a lawyer assisting a non-lawyer in the unlicensed practice of law, it would also potentially be a breach of the essay duty to provide candid advice . Understand that it will not be what the entire essay is about, but that you will get some points for noting that the lawyer is likely subject to discipline for assisting a non-lawyer in the unlicensed practice of law. Another area to types be thinking of in general is essay australia, Professional Responsibility in the Criminal Law context. Other things to keep in mind with Professional Responsibility: Always in Professional Responsibility you should be prepared to discuss the issue of an attorney#8217;s withdrawal when must an attorney withdraw, when may an attorney withdraw and how must an attorney withdraw properly (assuming the attorney may or must withdraw in the first place). Types Proposals! In addition, always be sure to address any potential and actual conflicts of interest on your exam.

An example that has not been tested in some time that would generate a discussion of potential and actual conflicts is the scenario where a third party pays the Professional attorney#8217;s fees for of research proposals, the client. A Good Reflection Essay! For example, mother pays for son#8217;s legal fees first this is generally discussed as a potential conflict. When and if it becomes an types of research proposals, actual conflict (mother starts telling attorney how to handle son#8217;s case) you should discuss the actual conflict. These are the relationship points that passing bar exams are made of when you are able to show the grader that you understand the difference between a situation that is, or could be, a potential conflict of interest and when it becomes an of research, actual conflict of interest you have just informed the grader that you are savvy and ready. This is creative institute, more important than your ability to types of research proposals regurgitate precise rules.

Just wanted to make that point. And all of this on Professional Responsibility could be much a do about nothing as some bar rounds the bar examiners leave it off of the of infidelity essay portion. But, this is not the usual. So I would be prepared for Professional Responsibility. If you get Civil Procedure: Bear in mind that the most common areas for types proposals, testing in Civil Procedure are jurisdictional issues (personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction and venue). Civil Procedure was tested last on the July 2016 bar exam and for the first time tested California Civil Procedure. The prior time Civil Procedure was tested was on the July 2015 bar exam, and like many Civil Procedure essays, jurisdiction was tested. Don#8217;t concern yourself with when a subject was last tested (that is my job). I mention it only to give you some background and to let you know where/why I might be coming from in terms of my #8220;predictions.#8221; Areas that have not been tested in some time include: Class Actions (although this was tested in the context of the Performance Test on the July 2016 bar exam, so it is perhaps not as likely now), Notice and Code pleading distinctions (if tested this would be a tack on issue, not the whole essay.

Remember that Federal courts follow Notice pleading and CA follows Code or Fact Pleading). Be sure to know the rules for Notice and Code Pleading as this includes a California and Federal Rules distinction. Of Infidelity! As mentioned above in the #8220;short list#8221; of possibles, other testable tack on issues include: remittitur and addittur and the 7th Amendment right to a jury trial. Be sure to know the rules for proposals, remittur and addittur as this also presents a nice area of testing distinctions between California Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules. There is no guarantee you will or will not get Civil Procedure. But, be prepared for it (and yes, be prepared for the CA distinctions too)! I know, this is a lot. But, this is the bar exam, and far better for you to be prepared for the possibilities even if it is to simply know that these ARE the possibilities than to walk into the exam and freak out because you have an essay australia vision, Wills/CommunityProperty/Evidence cross-over exam. What might repeat from the of research February 2017 bar exam and show up again on the July 2017 bar exam?

First some topics WILL likely repeat from the February 2017 bar exam and show up again on the July 2017 bar exam. Obviously, you would typically expect to see Professional Responsibility repeat as it usually does from one bar round to the next. However, you should not be surprised to see any of the a good reflection topics that were tested on of research proposals, the February 2017 bar exam show up on australia, the July 2017 bar exam. EVIDENCE perhaps as a cross-over (marital/spousal privilege, attorney client privilege or hearsay. Evidence makes for a great cross-over subject and can be tested with many different subjects (including the fairly obvious cross-over with Criminal Procedure, but can also be tested as a cross over with Community Property and Wills think about Marital and types of research proposals, Spousal Communications Privileges as well as the California distinction with respect to romeo and juliet response these privileges. The area of Marital and Spousal Privilege is a highly testable area and comes up frequently on types of research proposals, the California bar essay section of the bar exam). So, by thesis now you might quite possibly be getting very anxious about this idea of seeing Evidence with Community Property or Wills or whatever they decide to throw your way. Don#8217;t be. When the proposals bar examiners combine multiple subjects like this, they rarely do so by sneaking it in or hiding this from you. In fact, the a good reflection examiners will typically provide separate calls asking asking about whether or not the of research proposals communication between Hal and Wilma (husband and wife) is privileged.

This would make it pretty clear that you are to discuss Marital and a good essay, Spousal Privileges. Evidence as a transcript style essay not as likely, but just in case, take a look: While Evidence is of research, not on my main list in terms of being an institute, entire essay, anything can repeat. While transcript style essays are not as common, this format has not been tested in some time and is therefore due. Types Of Research Proposals! If Evidence were to repeat as a full essay, then you should be prepared for the possibility of a transcript style Evidence essay. Remember if you see this type of Evidence exam that you need to look to discuss form objections (like: leading, non-responsive, etc.) and also, since it is a racehorse exam, you will likely need to discuss relevance in a very truncated way (in other words, get in, get out).

TORTS/TORTS REMEDIES While Torts was just tested on the February 2017 bar exam, it was only in the area of Fraud, Misrepresentation and Remedies. Text Response Essay! This leaves open quite a bit of Torts that has not been tested in a long time. Of Research Proposals! The most common area of testing in Torts is negligence. Thesis! Areas of Torts that have not been tested in of research proposals some time include: products liability and strict liability. Essay Of Infidelity! Torts remedies is also possible. The bar examiners could also test one of the miscellaneous Tort areas like Abuse of Process and Malicious Prosecution, Interference with Contract/Prospective Advantage or Nuisance. If you were to see Nuisance, then you would likely also have coverage of types of research, Remedies. Be sure to know your basic approach for Tort Remedies (1. Damages, 2. Restitution and 3. Injunctive relief, know the specific types of the psychology, Tort Damages, the specific types of types of research proposals, Restitutionary Remedies and the elements of Injunction). Also, the tracing rules have not been tested in some time.

I have included a handout for this area as well in relationship thesis case it is unfamiliar to you. ALWAYS know your negligence approach very well as this is types of research proposals, one of the more heavily tested areas of Torts. And, would be required of you if you were tested on Strict Products Liability. The difficulty in essay of infidelity #8220;predicting#8221; Torts for this bar round is that most everything has been tested in Torts and if you were to simply go with what was longest ago well then Tort Remedies (with Nuisance, Trespass to of research proposals Land and Chattels, Conversion and Professional, Remedies with heavy emphasis on the balancing of the hardships in Injunction). The next most likely in terms of how long ago it was tested, would be Products Liability. Proposals! But, then when you look at creative in delhi the last time Defamation was tested, it was tested in an oddball way. So it wasn#8217;t really a true Defamation exam. So what does all of this mean? Be ready (like you should be with any topic) for anything. The fact that when defamation was last tested it was an oddball type of question doesn#8217;t mean that you will now see a defamation exam.

I realize this is a bit of a kitchen sink in terms of of research proposals, what could come up in Torts. But, understand they can test anything. You may not see Torts at all. Romeo Text Essay! But, if you do, keep some of types of research, these things in mind. If BIZ ORGS were to repeat (not saying it is, but, here is what might be more likely if it does repeat): If you were to get Business Organizations (even though it was just tested): A favorite of the California bar examiners of relationship thesis, late has been partnerships and or corporations that are formed for the purpose of providing legal services. The issue that seems to types be a hot topic on these exams is: a lawyer assisting a non-lawyer in creative training the unlicensed practice of law. Types Of Research Proposals! IN GENERAL ALWAYS be mindful of REMEDIES! Remedies is tested frequently. In general, you should always be prepared to address Remedies even if it is just a minor issue on relationship, an exam that is mostly testing something else.

The bar examiners expect you to think like a lawyer and to resolve legal problems and of research proposals, issues. Sometimes, this involves your fashioning a remedy (like quasi-contract to prevent unjust enrichment, or constructive trust or equitable lien). You need to be aware that you can not, and should not, think of each subject in a vacuum. If you are in Community Property you may very well need to discuss the remedy of constructive trust (if even only briefly in thesis a sentence or two to of research simply explain to the grader that one spouse may be able to relationship actually get property back from the other or even a third party). Always be aware of the use of constructive trusts and equitable liens these come up frequently on bar exams and should be discussed together (if you see an issue with respect to constructive trust, then endeavor to also discuss equitable lien and visa versa). Remember, anything could be tested and you need to be prepared for that. Each bar round subjects repeat. As a result, you should be prepared for some of the topics that were tested on the February 2017 bar round to types of research proposals repeat on the July 2017 bar round. The purpose of essay the psychology, these #8220;predictions#8221; is to have you thinking about possible essay scenarios, close in time to the exam so that if you see any of these topics, you will have given these areas a bit of extra thought (even if all you did was read through the #8220;Short List#8221; and #8220;Detail#8221; posts. I wish all who are studying for the July 2017 Bar Exam the very best of proposals, luck!

Stay positive and believe in yourself! California Bar Exam Predictions The Short List. First of all I want to wish you all the very best of luck in essay of infidelity your studies and I want to thank you for of research proposals, following my blog. I am truly humbled by the responses from examinees who have sent emails – thank you so much. If you would like to reach me directly, please feel free to Development-Education send me an email at: barexamguru@yahoo.com. Proposals! If you have been following my blog you will know that I do not really like to Development-Education call my “predictions” predictions.

I do not claim to be able to predict the bar exam. I have simply come up with what I call essay scenarios that I think might be worth considering. Please understand that my students who pay to take my course do not appreciate it if I release our “predictions” weeks in advance to the world. They pay for the privilege of our insights – at least they see it that way. So it simply isn’t fair to give away part of what they pay for to everyone else for free.

In past rounds I have not made this available outside of our course. First of all, I do not claim (nor would I ever claim) that I could predict what is of research proposals, going to be tested on the bar exam. However, I do think it is worthwhile to Professional think about some possible essay scenarios when studying in the coming days. I also think that it makes sense to spend some time on topics that we have not seen on of research, the exam in some time. However, any topic could show up on the bar exam. And, you should expect to see some of the topics that were tested on the February 2017 bar exam, to repeat on the July 2017 bar exam. Typically two or even three subjects will repeat from one bar exam to the very next bar exam. Also, in the past, out of six essays you would expect to essay of infidelity see testing of of research, about 8 topics (this allowed for cross-over essays).

With only five essays, I would still expect to see at least one or two (maybe even more) cross-over essays. Note: if a topic does not make my list, that does NOT mean it is not going to vision show up on the bar exam. You need to be prepared for EVERY topic. My coverage below is simply a suggested emphasis and by no means should you interpret this to of research mean that something should be excluded from your studies. ALL subjects are testable and all subjects can repeat, back to back, from one bar round to the next.

You can almost bet that if you decide to leave a subject alone, that it will appear on the exam. Why should I review past exams today? Reviewing past exams – right before the essay actual exam – will improve your chances of spotting the correct issues. Anytime you review an types proposals, essay (and study the answer) it is really is a substantive review. By reviewing 3 or 4 Civil Procedure essays in a row, you will have a much better understanding of how to approach the subject if it shows up on the exam. Response! By the way, I believe Civil Procedure is likely (see #8220;Short List#8221; below). Of course, it may or may not be there.

But, if it is, it would probably be nice to know that this may be the beginning (finally) of types of research, a trend toward California Civil Procedure. If it is, Notice and essay, Code Pleading create a nice federal and California distinction point. Types Proposals! The issue of additur (where a judge increases a jury award) also creates a nice federal and California distinction point. In cases of additur, it is Professional Development-Education, available in California but NOT in federal courts as it violates the types of research proposals 7th Amendment right to a jury trial. Many things are “due” or “up”. All of this being said – no one can predict this exam. Nor should you direct your studies away from a topic because it isn’t on a good reflection essay, someone’s list of predicted topics. That would be very, very foolish.

So all of that being said, here are a few thoughts on what I think could be tested: The old, 3-day exam versus the new, 2-day exam and what it potentially means in term of subject coverage: In the past, when there were 6 essays, the Bar Examiners historically tested 8 or 9 topics (spread out over the 6 essays). Now that there are only 5 essays, I think you can still expect to see 7 to 9 topics tested as the examiners frequently test cross-over exams. SHORT LIST of possibles (see detail in next post): Criminal Law (Murder) or Torts (If Criminal Law Murder possibly alone or crossed with Criminal Procedure or Evidence. Of Research! If Torts most any area if possible but longest ago in terms of testing are Negligence and Products Liability. Constitutional Law (Possibly First Amendment or Dormant Commerce Clause) Professional Responsibility (look out for attorney advertising or assisting a non-lawyer in the unlicensed practice of law, and ALWAYS duty to avoid conflict of interests and Professional, duty of loyalty, more details in the #8220;Detail#8221; post) Civil Procedure (jurisdictional issues are most commonly tested, but Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel are a bit due. Types! Also look out for: issues of remittitur/additur, pleading issues (like notice and code pleading), 7th Amendment right to a jury trial as these issues can come up as short answer, tack-on issues. The last time Civ Prop was tested (July 2016) California Civil Procedure came up for the very first time.

This may be the essay the psychology of infidelity beginning (finally) of of research proposals, a trend toward California Civil Procedure. Relationship Thesis! If it is, Notice and Code Pleading create a nice federal and California distinction point. The issue of of research, additur (where a judge increases a jury award) also creates a nice federal and California distinction point. In cases of additur, it is available in California but NOT in federal courts as it violates the 7th Amendment right to a jury trial. Community Property (Possibly valuation of separate property business, personal injury award, time rule for relationship, determining community property interest of pension, retirement or reimbursement for education or license. Types Of Research Proposals! Always be on look out for transmutation issue).

If Property: (possibly landlord/tenant or landlord/tenant crossed with covenants and equitable servitudes). Property was last tested on the July 2016 bar exam. Professional! At that time, I was predicting either Easements (specifically in types the land sale contract area) or Landlord/Tenant. Since the bar tested easements in the land-sale context that round, I am leaning more towards a Landlord/Tenant exam (if you see property at training institute all on the essays) and types of research, possibly crossed over a non-assignment or non-sublease clause and covenants (for example, a covenant restricting what can be done on the land, a sublessee takes possession and starts breaching the essay covenant. Can the covenant be enforced against the sublessee? Is there another remedy available perhaps enforcing the restriction as an equitable servitude? Don#8217;t freak out.

Just know that if there is a covenant on your exam that you should discuss both covenants and equitable servitudes as these most always go together. This is a scenario, in the landlord/tenant context that we have not seen tested in a while and of research, as a result, it may be due. A Good Reflection! If Contracts: While both of of research, these topics are possible, I am leaning towards a possible: #8220;either Property or Contracts#8221; on this upcoming exam. Property and Contracts are a bit hard to predict for relationship thesis, this bar round given the testing on the February 2017 exam. While neither Property or Contracts was really tested outright on the February 2017 exam essays, the types bar examiners sort of essay australia, tip-toed in the areas of both Property and Contracts (I am talking about the Tort/Remedies exam that tested Fraud and Misrep and types of research, Remedies). Possible Repeat topics: (Remember historically the California bar examiners repeat two or three topics from one bar round to the next. This includes the expected Professional Responsibility essay, which is rarely skipped). The Psychology! Remedies as a possible repeat topic: Say what? Yes, it could repeat, anything can repeat.

Remedies is on many bar exams back to back. What was not tested last bar round in Remedies: Injunction or Contract Remedies. Evidence as a possible repeat topic/crossover topic: Possibly as a cross-over with another topic for example: Marital/Spousal Privilege, Attorney-Client Privilege or Hearsay issue crossed over with another subject. Of Research! Be sure to know these privileges and institute in delhi, rules and especially know the California/Federal distinctions in Marital and types proposals, Spousal Privilege. Romeo And Juliet Response Questions! Professional Responsibility usually repeats (as listed above) Note: Per the California State Bar Examiners own rules, PR will be on either the essay portion or on types, the performance test every bar round).

Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure possible repeat topic. Even though this subject made the main list of thesis, possibles, it really would be (if tested) a repeat. But, it has been so long since murder has been tested that I believe it is highly likely it will come up within the types of research next year. It may be more likely to be on the February 2018 bar exam. BUT, if it were me taking the exam this July, I would most definitely be prepared for Criminal Law Murder or Criminal Law Murder with Criminal Procedure. Keep in the psychology of infidelity mind that anything can be tested. Types Of Research Proposals! Do not dismiss any topic. First Amendment Speech was once tested three times back to back. Many other subjects have been tested three times in a row. Anything is possible.

However, the above #8220;predictions#8221; are what I believe may be more probable essay scenarios for the July 2017 bar exam. Remember that you can accomplish so much in these final hours. Tomorrow, you will be relying in thesis part on short term memory, so make certain that you study well and review writing approaches. I am always stunned at how some examinees will say: “If I don’t already know it now, it is too late”. That could not be more untrue. It is NOT too late. Of Research Proposals! Study essay approaches and training institute, read essays! I wish all who are studying for types proposals, this exam the the psychology very best of luck! Bar None Review and Bar Exam Cram Session. Bar Exam Cram Session Live Streamed! With fewer than three weeks remaining to study for the bar exam, time is critical.

What will you do to ensure success on the exam? One of the main reasons examinees fail is not for lack of studying, but for types proposals, lack of creative writing, studying the right material. In order to navigate 6 1/2 hours of testing on of research, day one and 6 hours of testing on day two, you need to have a strategy. For success on the essays it requires far more than rote memorization. Approaches (for the essays, the essay vision MBEs and for the performance test) are critical. I will be writing more in the coming days about how to memorize and prepare in these final weeks leading up to the bar exam. Of Research Proposals! We still have a few spots left in the July 8 and 9 Bar Exam Cram Session (this weekend) in Los Angeles. If you can not attend in person, but do not want to relationship thesis miss out on this bar passing weekend, you can sign up for our live stream! Students who attend this session receive our Digging Deeper into proposals, the Bar Exam Series (a weekly email support series) containing additional predictions, study advice and strategy as well as our method and strategies for improving your MBE score, sample essays and answers based upon the predictions and on the most commonly tested essay scenarios. Students will also receive (as part of the romeo response essay Digging Deeper into of research proposals, the Bar Exam Series) approaches and advice for the new, 90 minute Performance Test and selected videos covering study tips, exam predictions and Professional Development-Education, approaches). In addition, Students will learn how to of research adapt (their studies, timing and strategy) to the new two-day format.

Past students have taken our Bar Exam Cram Session and improved their scaled score by Professional over 200 points by utilizing the techniques and step-by-step essay approaches that are taught not only over the course of this weekend, but leading up through the types of research bar exam. Development-Education! Each student receives a Ten Day Study Plan to utilize in the final days leading up to the bar exam as well as instruction on how to study over of research the few weeks. Don#8217;t miss out, sign up today! Then sign up for essay of infidelity, this: The Bar Exam Cram Session. Note: Live streaming must be purchased by Thursday, July 6 to ensure your #8220;seat#8221; in types the online program. Thesis! For a limited time, use promotional code: BAREXAMGURU and receive $100.00 off the course fee. For more information, contact Bar None Review at: 213-529-0990. All the best in your studies!

How to of research Pass the California Bar Exam: Part Two. Romeo And Juliet Text Essay! First, I want to thank you for following this blog. To date, we have had over 935, 000 views! I take great pleasure in being able to of research proposals offer assistance to those who are struggling through the the psychology of infidelity grind of bar studies. It is truly humbling to have your readership. The bar exam is now less than a month away. This week is often one of the most critical weeks in a July bar examinee#8217;s review period.

Many are starting to realize the sheer weight of types of research proposals, what has to be done and fear starts to creep in essay questions and even take over. Anxiety starts to run high, and if allowed to go unchecked, can be any bar examinee#8217;s demise. It is normal to types of research experience some anxiety and fear during this time especially when you think about how much you might still need to Professional learn, let alone memorize. However, it is important that you put things into perspective. The bar exam, while now less than a month away, is not tomorrow. Types Proposals! You have time to improve and to work on memorization. One of the romeo text response essay best ways to eliminate anxiety is to start memorizing the material. One of the most common questions I field every bar round is: #8220;How the heck am I going to memorize all of proposals, this material?

There is essay australia, so much to memorize!#8221; One of the challenges of the bar exam is that students often suffer from information overload. Of Research! Sometimes, the more diligent a student is, the more they read outlines and the more they try to memorize volumes and volumes of material, t.he more anxiety, and the less sure an examinee is of anything let alone successfully taking the exam on July 25 and 26. While it may seem like the right thing to do, I caution students against getting into the rut of and juliet response essay, reading extensive and types, lengthy outlines to the exclusion of other things that should be done (like reviewing and relationship, studying past essay exams and answers, practicing and studying past MBEs, writing practice exams under non-timed and timed conditions). Reading outlines that are 1oo to 150 pages for each subject and trying to commit these to memory for 15 subjects is not only very difficult, but it is counter-productive. Instead, start carving out time to review past exams and answers. By reviewing and learning from the actual past exams, you will help bridge the gap between being able to recite an outline and being able to write an actual essay answer.

SPEND TIME LEARNING BY STUDYING THE TEST (as in the ACTUAL TEST) This is of research, true for a good essay, all aspects of the exam (essay portion, performance test and MBE section). The only way to really know and understand the material, is to see it in the context of the exam. Will reading essays and completing MBEs alone be enough? Not likely, but without this kind of types proposals, review, failure is almost certain. You need to not only put your knowledge to the test and Development-Education, practice the test, you need to learn from the test. Here are some suggestions of what I think you should consider doing in the coming days leading up to the bar exam.

If you do these things, it will make the job of memorizing the law much easier. It is proposals, imperative that you understand the law you are memorizing. Thesis! One of the biggest mistakes that examinees make is to fail to truly learn and understand the material. There is sometimes such a focus on types of research proposals, memorization that examinees delay reviewing the actual test. This can prove to be disastrous. You do not want to wait until the bar exam to figure out if you actually understand how the issues arise. Rule statements are important, but being able to determine when something is at issue or not, will require that you understand the law and how it is tested. Being able to write rule statements from memory does not necessarily mean that you understand (when faced with a fact pattern) what the issues turn upon. It is key that you are able to understand the material, and Professional, not just being able to recite the rules. So when you think about memorizing the material think about first #8220;understanding the types law.#8221; This means: understanding what the terms mean, how the issues are generated and how the issues are tested. Once you understand the material, memorizing it will be much easier.

2. Essay! You need to see (and learn) the material in the context of the exam. Again, being able to recite rule statements is something that most examinees strive to do and types, do so fairly effectively. The problem is Development-Education, that your job on exam day is proposals, not going to be to creative training institute simply write out a Contracts outline or to write out types a Torts outline. Yet, if you think about it, examinees often spend their time preparing for the exam as though the romeo essay questions exam consists of simply reciting rules. While it is certainly a help, it is only part of what is needed to pass the exam.

Successful examinees not only are able to recite rules, they know how the material is tested and understand the material in the context of the actual exam. To do this, you should review past essays and answers. When reviewing essays, really study the answers and pay close attention to of research which issues were addressed in essay australia vision the answers and how these issues arose from the facts. Reading essays and proposals, studying the training institute answers is critical to of research passing the California bar exam. There are simply ways that the material is tested that are not intuitive and will be lost on you unless you actually see it in the context of the a good reflection essay actual exam. For the of research MBEs (as well as for the essays) it is critical that you learn how each subject is tested. A Good Essay! For example, you need to learn how Torts is tested, how Constitutional Law is tested, Property, etc. This is key. The best way to accomplish this is to study past MBEs (I recommend that you work on NCBE drafted MBES ONLY). Three sources for NCBE released questions are: 1) The Strategies and Tactics for the MBE by Walton and Emanuel 6th edition (and no, it is not too late to take advantage of this excellent book), 2) Adaptibar and types, 3) the National Conference of Bar Examiners.

The reason you want to focus your attention and energy on the NCBE released MBEs is because it will be important for you to align yourself with what the National Conference of Bar Examiners is testing and how they are testing, as this is will be the closest approximation to the actual test. Think of it this way: you need to relationship know what the types NCBE think amounts to a taking by force such that a robbery occurred rather than what you think factually amounts to a taking by force or what your law professor thought was a taking by force. Focus on essay, completing NCBE MBEs. It is types of research, important to work on MBEs under both timed as well as completing non-timed review of MBEs. 3. Work on memorizing a condensed version of the subjects after you have spent time reviewing past exams. It will be so much easier to memorize material once you actually understand it, understand how it is applied and how it is tested. As I suggest above, one of the best ways to gain an understanding of the writing institute material is to see how it is tested. Once you have studied how products liability is tested, you will have a much easier time memorizing what you need to of research know for Products Liability. What you will ultimately have to memorize will be less when it represents what you fully understand. Let#8217;s look at an example in Torts, specifically Products Liability. Products liability is a big topic with a lot of a good reflection, detail.

When tested on the essay portion, it is a #8220;race-horse#8221; style exam. When tested on types proposals, the MBE, you will need to creative have a solid understanding of of research proposals, all of the aspects of Products Liability in Professional Development-Education order to make successful distinctions between strict products liability, warranty theories, negligence and of research proposals, all of the defenses that may or may not be available. Thesis! To successfully navigate a products liability essay exam you will need to have an approach for, and a condensed version of, products liability memorized (and, of course, understood ). For example, the following would be a good approach for Products Liability: Introductory statement: The plaintiff may recover under products liability for the following torts: 1) intentional tort (usually battery), 2) negligence, 3) strict products liability (for defective product) and 4) under the warranty theories (implied warranty and express Intentional Tort (here plaintiff may be able to prove the types tort of battery if they can show the defendant knew with substantial certainty that a harmful or offensive result would occur look for facts that state percentage rates of failure this suggests the defendant knew with substantial certainty that _% of the thesis time the product would cause a harmful or offensive result. This is always a quick discussion, but worth points by types addressing it quickly this is generally addressed in essay the psychology of infidelity every released answer for products liability essays, yet many examinees miss this point). Negligence all in the commercial chain owe a duty to plaintiff reasonable manufacturer, reasonable retailer etc. Types! Write a normal negligence discussion, but focus on drawing attention to the psychology of infidelity the breach as being a failure to warn or negligent design as these will be easily referred to once you are in your strict products liability discussion. Strict Liability for Defective Product (unreasonably dangerous) strict liability attaches by types of research placing an unreasonably dangerous product in the market place. Thesis! Your focus will be to prove that the types of research product is a defective product. There are three ways to prove this: 1) manufacturing defect (rarely tested on the essays), 2) design defect (often tested) and 3) warning defect (often tested). Prove up one or more ways the a good reflection product is types proposals, defective (usually both #2 and #3 above), then briefly discuss causation (you can refer back to your discussion of a good essay, causation under your Negligence call if you have already discussed negligence) and then conclude. Proposals! Of course discuss any appropriate defenses (i.e., assumption of the risk, learned intermediary, etc.).

Warranty Theories Implied Warranty of Merchantability implied into every sale that goods are of fair and a good essay, average quality and fit for of research, the ordinary purpose . A Good! This is of research proposals, something you will typically address on EVERY products liability essay as it is always present. Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular purpose you may or may not need to a good discuss this warranty it must be generated by the facts. Types Of Research Proposals! Express Warranty you may or may not need to discuss this type of Professional, warranty it must be generated by the facts. Note that you can condense this even further and of research, ultimately turn it into a checklist/shorthand approach for products liability. We still have room in australia vision our upcoming Bar Exam Cram Session on July 8th and of research proposals, 9th. This will be offered both in person and via live stream. Click here for more information and to creative writing training institute in delhi register . Getting a handle on how the substantive material plays out on types of research proposals, the essay exams (as well as how it is essay, tested on the MBEs) is critical to your success. Types! The above shorthand coverage of Products Liability is an example of how you should be viewing the material. How much easier would it be to write a products liability exam if you actually knew, going into the exam, what areas to write on and for how long? Studying past bar exam essays and answers will help you not only with your understanding of the law, but also with your memorization.

Memorizing a step-by-step approach for each area will enable you to get to writing your answer more quickly because you will know how to start your exam. Your answer will look more organized, your issue coverage will be better and it will look like you know what you are doing because . . . you do. This also will help you master the MBEs as well. Often examinees struggle with their MBEs because they do not have an approach for topics within a subject. For example, most examinees have a basic approach for Negligence (duty, breach, causation and damages, defenses). But, few realize that the California bar examiners actually expect quite a bit more than this in terms of what is discussed, head-noted and identified as an issue on essay exam.

Having a clear approach for all topics will not only help you to navigate an essay, essay exam, but will also help you to select the correct answer choice on the MBEs. Our next topic for types of research proposals, the blog will include: How do I get started on each essay what do I write? How do I start each essay topic? What should my first sentence be? What should my headings be? How do I know how to interpret the call of the question(s)? These are not typically things that will be answered by studying outlines.

And, you must know how to start each topic, you must know what to write and what your approach is going to be for each area. This is key to relationship thesis success on both the types of research essays and essay, the MBEs because you can not afford to burn up valuable test taking time with trying to types of research proposals synthesize or sort these things out on exam day! And, all too often, this is what examinees do find themselves trying to figure all of this out on exam day. I believe this is one of the Development-Education most common reasons examinees fail the exam. It isn#8217;t as often about not knowing enough law, it is more about not knowing how to apply it, how to organize it and how to write it. Of Research Proposals! There is a form, and order and an embraced approach for every topic. You need to get to this point, and not simply be a machine that spouts out definitions. You are more than that, much more, you need to be able to show the examiners that you are able to (and do) think like a lawyer.

That is the topic of writing training, my next post.

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
Research Project Proposal | Definition, Format, Types - Write a Writing

My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant. By JOSE ANTONIO VARGAS JUNE 22, 2011. One August morning nearly two decades ago, my mother woke me and put me in proposals, a cab. She handed me a jacket. “ Baka malamig doon ” were among the few words she said. (“It might be cold there.”) When I arrived at the Philippines’ Ninoy Aquino International Airport with her, my aunt and a family friend, I was introduced to thesis a man I’d never seen. Types. They told me he was my uncle. Essay. He held my hand as I boarded an airplane for types of research proposals the first time. It was 1993, and I was 12. My mother wanted to give me a better life, so she sent me thousands of thesis miles away to live with her parents in America — my grandfather ( Lolo in Tagalog) and grandmother ( Lola ). After I arrived in Mountain View, Calif., in the San Francisco Bay Area, I entered sixth grade and quickly grew to types of research proposals love my new home, family and culture. I discovered a passion for language, though it was hard to learn the a good reflection essay difference between formal English and American slang.

One of my early memories is types of research proposals of a freckled kid in middle school asking me, “What’s up?” I replied, “The sky,” and Professional he and a couple of other kids laughed. I won the types proposals eighth-grade spelling bee by memorizing words I couldn’t properly pronounce. (The winning word was “indefatigable.”) One day when I was 16, I rode my bike to the nearby D.M.V. office to get my driver’s permit. Writing Training. Some of my friends already had their licenses, so I figured it was time. Of Research. But when I handed the clerk my green card as proof of U.S. residency, she flipped it around, examining it. “This is fake,” she whispered. “Don’t come back here again.” Confused and the psychology scared, I pedaled home and confronted Lolo. I remember him sitting in the garage, cutting coupons. I dropped my bike and ran over to types of research him, showing him the green card. “ Peke ba ito ?” I asked in Tagalog. (“Is this fake?”) My grandparents were naturalized American citizens — he worked as a security guard, she as a food server — and creative writing training institute in delhi they had begun supporting my mother and me financially when I was 3, after my father’s wandering eye and inability to properly provide for us led to my parents’ separation.

Lolo was a proud man, and I saw the shame on his face as he told me he purchased the card, along with other fake documents, for me. “Don’t show it to other people,” he warned. I decided then that I could never give anyone reason to doubt I was an American. Of Research Proposals. I convinced myself that if I worked enough, if I achieved enough, I would be rewarded with citizenship. I felt I could earn it. I’ve tried. Response Essay. Over the past 14 years, I’ve graduated from high school and college and built a career as a journalist, interviewing some of the types of research proposals most famous people in the country.

On the surface, I’ve created a good life. I’ve lived the American dream. But I am still an writing training, undocumented immigrant. And that means living a different kind of reality. It means going about my day in fear of being found out. It means rarely trusting people, even those closest to me, with who I really am. It means keeping my family photos in a shoebox rather than displaying them on shelves in my home, so friends don’t ask about them. Types Proposals. It means reluctantly, even painfully, doing things I know are wrong and Professional unlawful. Of Research Proposals. And it has meant relying on a sort of 21st-century underground railroad of supporters, people who took an interest in my future and vision took risks for me.

Last year I read about of research, four students who walked from Miami to Washington to lobby for the Dream Act, a nearly decade-old immigration bill that would provide a path to Professional Development-Education legal permanent residency for types of research proposals young people who have been educated in this country. At the risk of deportation — the vision Obama administration has deported almost 800,000 people in the last two years — they are speaking out. Their courage has inspired me. There are believed to be 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. We’re not always who you think we are. Some pick your strawberries or care for your children. Some are in high school or college. And some, it turns out, write news articles you might read. I grew up here. This is my home.

Yet even though I think of of research myself as an American and consider America my country, my country doesn’t think of me as one of relationship thesis its own. My first challenge was the language. Though I learned English in the Philippines, I wanted to lose my accent. Types. During high school, I spent hours at a time watching television (especially “Frasier,” “Home Improvement” and reruns of “The Golden Girls”) and movies (from “Goodfellas” to “Anne of Green Gables”), pausing the essay VHS to try to copy how various characters enunciated their words. Proposals. At the romeo and juliet questions local library, I read magazines, books and newspapers — anything to learn how to types of research proposals write better.

Kathy Dewar, my high-school English teacher, introduced me to journalism. From the moment I wrote my first article for the student paper, I convinced myself that having my name in print — writing in English, interviewing Americans — validated my presence here. The debates over “illegal aliens” intensified my anxieties. In 1994, only text questions a year after my flight from the Philippines, Gov. Types Of Research. Pete Wilson was re-elected in part because of his support for reflection essay Proposition 187, which prohibited undocumented immigrants from attending public school and accessing other services. Proposals. (A federal court later found the law unconstitutional.) After my encounter at the D.M.V. in 1997, I grew more aware of training institute anti-immigrant sentiments and types proposals stereotypes: they don’t want to assimilate, they are a drain on society. Professional Development-Education. They’re not talking about me, I would tell myself.

I have something to contribute. To do that, I had to work — and for that, I needed a Social Security number. Types. Fortunately, my grandfather had already managed to get one for me. Lolo had always taken care of everyone in the family. He and my grandmother emigrated legally in 1984 from Zambales, a province in the Philippines of relationship thesis rice fields and bamboo houses­, following Lolo’s sister, who married a Filipino-American serving in the American military. She petitioned for her brother and his wife to join her. When they got here, Lolo petitioned for his two children — my mother and types proposals her younger brother — to follow them. Australia. But instead of mentioning that my mother was a married woman, he listed her as single. Legal residents can’t petition for their married children. Besides, Lolo didn’t care for my father. He didn’t want him coming here too.

But soon Lolo grew nervous that the immigration authorities reviewing the of research petition would discover my mother was married, thus derailing not only her chances of coming here but those of thesis my uncle as well. So he withdrew her petition. After my uncle came to America legally in 1991, Lolo tried to get my mother here through a tourist visa, but she wasn’t able to obtain one. That’s when she decided to send me. My mother told me later that she figured she would follow me soon. Types Proposals. She never did. The “uncle” who brought me here turned out to be a coyote, not a relative, my grandfather later explained. Lolo scraped together enough money — I eventually learned it was $4,500, a huge sum for him — to essay pay him to smuggle me here under a fake name and fake passport. (I never saw the types passport again after the flight and have always assumed that the coyote kept it.) After I arrived in America, Lolo obtained a new fake Filipino passport, in my real name this time, adorned with a fake student visa, in addition to essay australia the fraudulent green card. Using the types proposals fake passport, we went to the local Social Security Administration office and applied for a Social Security number and card.

It was, I remember, a quick visit. Essay. When the card came in the mail, it had my full, real name, but it also clearly stated: “Valid for work only with I.N.S. authorization.” When I began looking for types work, a short time after the D.M.V. incident, my grandfather and I took the Social Security card to Kinko’s, where he covered the “I.N.S. authorization” text with a sliver of white tape. We then made photocopies of the card. At a glance, at least, the copies would look like copies of a regular, unrestricted Social Security card. Lolo always imagined I would work the kind of Development-Education low-paying jobs that undocumented people often take. Types Of Research Proposals. (Once I married an American, he said, I would get my real papers, and everything would be fine.) But even menial jobs require documents, so he and I hoped the essay of infidelity doctored card would work for now. The more documents I had, he said, the better. While in high school, I worked part time at types of research, Subway, then at the front desk of the local Y.M.C.A., then at a tennis club, until I landed an unpaid internship at The Mountain View Voice, my hometown newspaper. First I brought coffee and helped around the Professional Development-Education office; eventually I began covering city-hall meetings and other assignments for pay. For more than a decade of getting part-time and full-time jobs, employers have rarely asked to of research check my original Social Security card.

When they did, I showed the relationship thesis photocopied version, which they accepted. Over time, I also began checking the citizenship box on my federal I-9 employment eligibility forms. (Claiming full citizenship was actually easier than declaring permanent resident “green card” status, which would have required me to types provide an Development-Education, alien registration number.) This deceit never got easier. The more I did it, the types of research proposals more I felt like an essay, impostor, the more guilt I carried — and the more I worried that I would get caught. But I kept doing it. Types Proposals. I needed to live and survive on my own, and I decided this was the way. Mountain View High School became my second home. I was elected to a good reflection represent my school at school-board meetings, which gave me the chance to meet and befriend Rich Fischer, the superintendent for our school district. I joined the speech and debate team, acted in school plays and eventually became co-editor of The Oracle, the types of research student newspaper. Australia Vision. That drew the attention of my principal, Pat Hyland. “You’re at types of research, school just as much as I am,” she told me.

Pat and Rich would soon become mentors, and over time, almost surrogate parents for me. After a choir rehearsal during my junior year, Jill Denny, the choir director, told me she was considering a Japan trip for our singing group. I told her I couldn’t afford it, but she said we’d figure out a way. I hesitated, and then decided to tell her the truth. “It’s not really the money,” I remember saying. “I don’t have the right passport.” When she assured me we’d get the proper documents, I finally told her. “I can’t get the reflection right passport,” I said. “I’m not supposed to be here.” She understood. So the choir toured Hawaii instead, with me in tow. (Mrs. Denny and I spoke a couple of months ago, and she told me she hadn’t wanted to leave any student behind.) Later that school year, my history class watched a documentary on Harvey Milk, the openly gay San Francisco city official who was assassinated.

This was 1999, just six months after Matthew Shepard’s body was found tied to a fence in Wyoming. During the types proposals discussion, I raised my hand and said something like: “I’m sorry Harvey Milk got killed for being gay. . . . I’ve been meaning to say this. Essay Australia. . Of Research Proposals. . . I’m gay.” I hadn’t planned on coming out that morning, though I had known that I was gay for several years. With that announcement, I became the only openly gay student at school, and it caused turmoil with my grandparents. A Good. Lolo kicked me out of the house for a few weeks. Though we eventually reconciled, I had disappointed him on two fronts. First, as a Catholic, he considered homosexuality a sin and was embarrassed about having “ ang apo na bakla ” (“a grandson who is types proposals gay”). Essay The Psychology. Even worse, I was making matters more difficult for types myself, he said. I needed to marry an American woman in and juliet response questions, order to gain a green card. Tough as it was, coming out about being gay seemed less daunting than coming out of research, about my legal status. Australia Vision. I kept my other secret mostly hidden.

While my classmates awaited their college acceptance letters, I hoped to get a full-time job at The Mountain View Voice after graduation. It’s not that I didn’t want to go to college, but I couldn’t apply for state and federal financial aid. Proposals. Without that, my family couldn’t afford to a good essay send me. But when I finally told Pat and types Rich about my immigration “problem” — as we called it from then on — they helped me look for thesis a solution. At first, they even wondered if one of them could adopt me and fix the situation that way, but a lawyer Rich consulted told him it wouldn’t change my legal status because I was too old. Eventually they connected me to a new scholarship fund for high-potential students who were usually the first in their families to attend college. Types Of Research. Most important, the fund was not concerned with immigration status.

I was among the first recipients, with the scholarship covering tuition, lodging, books and other expenses for a good reflection my studies at San Francisco State University. As a college freshman, I found a job working part time at The San Francisco Chronicle, where I sorted mail and wrote some freelance articles. My ambition was to get a reporting job, so I embarked on a series of internships. First I landed at The Philadelphia Daily News, in the summer of of research proposals 2001, where I covered a drive-by shooting and the wedding of the essay australia vision 76ers star Allen Iverson. Using those articles, I applied to types The Seattle Times and got an internship for the following summer.

But then my lack of text questions proper documents became a problem again. The Times’s recruiter, Pat Foote, asked all incoming interns to bring certain paperwork on their first day: a birth certificate, or a passport, or a driver’s license plus an original Social Security card. I panicked, thinking my documents wouldn’t pass muster. So before starting the of research job, I called Pat and told her about my legal status. After consulting with management, she called me back with the answer I feared: I couldn’t do the internship. This was devastating. What good was college if I couldn’t then pursue the career I wanted? I decided then that if I was to succeed in a profession that is all about creative writing, truth-telling, I couldn’t tell the proposals truth about myself.

After this episode, Jim Strand, the venture capitalist who sponsored my scholarship, offered to a good pay for types proposals an immigration lawyer. Rich and I went to meet her in essay of infidelity, San Francisco’s financial district. An error has occurred. Please try again later. You are already subscribed to this email. I was hopeful. This was in early 2002, shortly after Senators Orrin Hatch, the Utah Republican, and Dick Durbin, the Illinois Democrat, introduced the of research Dream Act — Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors. Development-Education. It seemed like the of research proposals legislative version of what I’d told myself: If I work hard and contribute, things will work out.

But the romeo text essay questions meeting left me crushed. My only solution, the of research proposals lawyer said, was to go back to the Philippines and accept a 10-year ban before I could apply to romeo questions return legally. If Rich was discouraged, he hid it well. Types. “Put this problem on a shelf,” he told me. “Compartmentalize it. Development-Education. Keep going.” And I did. For the summer of 2003, I applied for internships across the country.

Several newspapers, including The Wall Street Journal, The Boston Globe and The Chicago Tribune, expressed interest. But when The Washington Post offered me a spot, I knew where I would go. Of Research. And this time, I had no intention of acknowledging my “problem.” The Post internship posed a tricky obstacle: It required a driver’s license. (After my close call at the California D.M.V., I’d never gotten one.) So I spent an afternoon at The Mountain View Public Library, studying various states’ requirements. Oregon was among the most welcoming — and relationship thesis it was just a few hours’ drive north. Again, my support network came through. A friend’s father lived in Portland, and he allowed me to use his address as proof of residency. Pat, Rich and Rich’s longtime assistant, Mary Moore, sent letters to me at that address. Rich taught me how to do three-point turns in a parking lot, and a friend accompanied me to Portland.

The license meant everything to me — it would let me drive, fly and work. But my grandparents worried about the Portland trip and the Washington internship. While Lola offered daily prayers so that I would not get caught, Lolo told me that I was dreaming too big, risking too much. I was determined to pursue my ambitions. I was 22, I told them, responsible for my own actions. But this was different from Lolo’s driving a confused teenager to Kinko’s. I knew what I was doing now, and I knew it wasn’t right. But what was I supposed to do?

I was paying state and types of research federal taxes, but I was using an invalid Social Security card and writing false information on my employment forms. But that seemed better than depending on my grandparents or on Pat, Rich and Jim — or returning to australia a country I barely remembered. I convinced myself all would be O.K. if I lived up to the qualities of a “citizen”: hard work, self-reliance, love of my country. At the D.M.V. in Portland, I arrived with my photocopied Social Security card, my college I.D., a pay stub from The San Francisco Chronicle and my proof of types of research proposals state residence — the letters to the Portland address that my support network had sent. It worked. My license, issued in australia vision, 2003, was set to expire eight years later, on my 30th birthday, on Feb. 3, 2011. Of Research. I had eight years to succeed professionally, and to relationship hope that some sort of immigration reform would pass in the meantime and allow me to stay. It seemed like all the time in the world. My summer in Washington was exhilarating. I was intimidated to be in a major newsroom but was assigned a mentor — Peter Perl, a veteran magazine writer — to help me navigate it.

A few weeks into the internship, he printed out one of my articles, about a guy who recovered a long-lost wallet, circled the first two paragraphs and of research left it on my desk. “Great eye for details — awesome!” he wrote. Though I didn’t know it then, Peter would become one more member of essay vision my network. At the types of research end of the summer, I returned to The San Francisco Chronicle. Romeo And Juliet Text Essay Questions. My plan was to finish school — I was now a senior — while I worked for The Chronicle as a reporter for the city desk. But when The Post beckoned again, offering me a full-time, two-year paid internship that I could start when I graduated in types, June 2004, it was too tempting to pass up. I moved back to Washington. About four months into Professional my job as a reporter for The Post, I began feeling increasingly paranoid, as if I had “illegal immigrant” tattooed on my forehead — and in Washington, of all places, where the debates over immigration seemed never-ending. I was so eager to prove myself that I feared I was annoying some colleagues and editors — and types proposals worried that any one of these professional journalists could discover my secret. The anxiety was nearly paralyzing. I decided I had to australia vision tell one of the higher-ups about my situation.

I turned to Peter. By this time, Peter, who still works at The Post, had become part of management as the paper’s director of newsroom training and types proposals professional development. One afternoon in late October, we walked a couple of blocks to Lafayette Square, across from the White House. The Psychology. Over some 20 minutes, sitting on a bench, I told him everything: the Social Security card, the types proposals driver’s license, Pat and response essay questions Rich, my family. Peter was shocked. “I understand you 100 times better now,” he said. He told me that I had done the right thing by types proposals, telling him, and that it was now our shared problem. Romeo And Juliet Text Essay Questions. He said he didn’t want to do anything about it just yet. I had just been hired, he said, and I needed to prove myself. “When you’ve done enough,” he said, “we’ll tell Don and Len together.” (Don Graham is the chairman of of research The Washington Post Company; Leonard Downie Jr. was then the creative in delhi paper’s executive editor.) A month later, I spent my first Thanksgiving in types of research, Washington with Peter and his family. In the romeo and juliet text essay five years that followed, I did my best to “do enough.” I was promoted to staff writer, reported on of research, video-game culture, wrote a series on Washington’s H.I.V./AIDS epidemic and covered the thesis role of technology and social media in the 2008 presidential race. I visited the White House, where I interviewed senior aides and covered a state dinner — and gave the Secret Service the proposals Social Security number I obtained with false documents. I did my best to steer clear of reporting on immigration policy but couldn’t always avoid it.

On two occasions, I wrote about Hillary Clinton’s position on driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants. I also wrote an article about Senator Mel Martinez of Florida, then the chairman of the Republican National Committee, who was defending his party’s stance toward Latinos after only a good essay one Republican presidential candidate — John McCain, the co-author of a failed immigration bill — agreed to participate in a debate sponsored by Univision, the Spanish-language network. It was an odd sort of types dance: I was trying to stand out in a highly competitive newsroom, yet I was terrified that if I stood out too much, I’d invite unwanted scrutiny. Australia Vision. I tried to compartmentalize my fears, distract myself by reporting on the lives of other people, but there was no escaping the types of research central conflict in my life. Maintaining a deception for creative writing institute in delhi so long distorts your sense of self. You start wondering who you’ve become, and why.

In April 2008, I was part of a Post team that won a Pulitzer Prize for the paper’s coverage of the Virginia Tech shootings a year earlier. Lolo died a year earlier, so it was Lola who called me the day of the announcement. The first thing she said was, “ Anong mangyayari kung malaman ng mga tao ?” What will happen if people find out? I couldn’t say anything. After we got off the phone, I rushed to the bathroom on the fourth floor of the newsroom, sat down on the toilet and cried.

In the summer of 2009, without ever having had that follow-up talk with top Post management, I left the types paper and moved to Professional New York to proposals join The Huffington Post. Relationship Thesis. I met Arianna Huffington at a Washington Press Club Foundation dinner I was covering for The Post two years earlier, and types proposals she later recruited me to join her news site. I wanted to learn more about creative training in delhi, Web publishing, and I thought the types proposals new job would provide a useful education. Still, I was apprehensive about the move: many companies were already using E-Verify, a program set up by relationship, the Department of of research proposals Homeland Security that checks if prospective employees are eligible to work, and australia I didn’t know if my new employer was among them. But I’d been able to proposals get jobs in other newsrooms, I figured, so I filled out the paperwork as usual and succeeded in landing on the payroll. While I worked at The Huffington Post, other opportunities emerged. My H.I.V./AIDS series became a documentary film called “The Other City,” which opened at the Tribeca Film Festival last year and relationship was broadcast on Showtime. I began writing for magazines and landed a dream assignment: profiling Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg for types of research The New Yorker. The more I achieved, the more scared and depressed I became.

I was proud of Professional Development-Education my work, but there was always a cloud hanging over it, over me. Proposals. My old eight-year deadline — the expiration of romeo text response essay questions my Oregon driver’s license — was approaching. After slightly less than a year, I decided to leave The Huffington Post. In part, this was because I wanted to promote the documentary and write a book about online culture — or so I told my friends. But the real reason was, after so many years of trying to be a part of the system, of types focusing all my energy on Development-Education, my professional life, I learned that no amount of professional success would solve my problem or ease the sense of types proposals loss and displacement I felt. I lied to a friend about why I couldn’t take a weekend trip to Mexico. Another time I concocted an excuse for why I couldn’t go on an all-expenses-paid trip to relationship thesis Switzerland. I have been unwilling, for years, to be in types of research, a long-term relationship because I never wanted anyone to get too close and ask too many questions. All the essay australia while, Lola’s question was stuck in my head: What will happen if people find out?

Early this year, just two weeks before my 30th birthday, I won a small reprieve: I obtained a driver’s license in the state of of research Washington. The license is valid until 2016. Relationship. This offered me five more years of acceptable identification — but also five more years of fear, of lying to types of research proposals people I respect and institutions that trusted me, of running away from who I am. I’m done running. I’m exhausted. Essay Vision. I don’t want that life anymore. So I’ve decided to types of research proposals come forward, own up to what I’ve done, and tell my story to the best of my recollection. I’ve reached out to former bosses­ and employers and apologized for misleading them — a mix of humiliation and liberation coming with each disclosure.

All the people mentioned in reflection, this article gave me permission to use their names. I’ve also talked to family and friends about my situation and am working with legal counsel to types of research review my options. I don’t know what the consequences will be of romeo text response essay telling my story. I do know that I am grateful to types of research my grandparents, my Lolo and romeo and juliet questions Lola, for giving me the chance for of research a better life. I’m also grateful to my other family — the support network I found here in America — for encouraging me to pursue my dreams. It’s been almost 18 years since I’ve seen my mother. Early on, I was mad at her for putting me in this position, and then mad at myself for being angry and ungrateful.

By the time I got to college, we rarely spoke by phone. It became too painful; after a while it was easier to just send money to training institute help support her and types of research my two half-siblings. My sister, almost 2 years old when I left, is almost 20 now. I’ve never met my 14-year-old brother. I would love to see them. Not long ago, I called my mother. I wanted to fill the gaps in my memory about that August morning so many years ago. We had never discussed it. Essay. Part of me wanted to types shove the memory aside, but to write this article and face the facts of my life, I needed more details. Did I cry? Did she?

Did we kiss goodbye? My mother told me I was excited about training institute, meeting a stewardess, about getting on a plane. She also reminded me of the one piece of advice she gave me for blending in: If anyone asked why I was coming to America, I should say I was going to Disneyland. Jose Antonio Vargas (Jose@DefineAmerican.com) is a former reporter for The Washington Post and shared a Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the Virginia Tech shootings. Proposals. He founded Define American, which seeks to change the conversation on immigration reform. Editor: Chris Suellentrop (C.Suellentrop-MagGroup@nytimes.com) A version of this article appears in print on June 26, 2011, on essay, Page MM22 of the Sunday Magazine with the types proposals headline: Outlaw. Today's Paper | Subscribe. We’re interested in your feedback on this page.

Tell us what you think.

Pay for Essay and Get the Best Paper You Need -
Types of Proposals | Research | Michigan Technological University

20 Tips For Writing Successful Paper, Digital, and Social Resumes. Are you looking to refresh your paper resume this year? You might be in for a little surprise to find out that it's not just your printed manuscript that can land you the perfect teaching position. In this episode of the Jersey Educator Podcast we take a look at 20 things to proposals consider before starting your next job search. This week on the Jersey Educator Podcast, Jim Boice and Jeff Bradbury sat down for a candid discussion about how educators should be crafting their 2017 resumes. In this episode, we take a look at some key features that every resume should (or must) have and provide helpful tips for not only your #8220;paper#8221; resume, but also your digital and social resumes as well. This episode of the Jersey Educator Podcast can be found on iTunes and Stitcher Radio and is a companion episode to a previous show where we discussed 11 things every educator should be thinking about as they prepare for a job interview or job fair. What is a resume . . . Development-Education. it's the age old question that everyone has an answer for, but yet nobody has the right answer. Types. Your resume in 2017 looks completely different than it did in 2007 and yet, has the format really changed? Yes and No. To set some standards for this post, I think we can all agree what a resume is.

Your resume is a gateway through a conversation . Text Questions. It is a document designed to proposals be handed to someone who is about to have a conversation with you. It is a professional yet concise way of showcasing your accomplishments in a format that allows your reader to (hopefully) select you above all other resumes in the stack and either create a positive situation that produces a phone call (for an interviewer) or a handshake and Development-Education a contract. In addition to your paper resume, we will also be digging into the additional parts that you can use to sell your unique individual brand, your website and types your social media presence to identify how you can create unique and eye catching experiences that will be sure to land you in front of your future employer. Your Cover Letter is generally one of, if not the australia vision first thing that someone sees when reviewing materials. Cover Letters should be crafted not only to provide a positive and well-rounded picture of you, but they should also provide knowledge that you have done a little bit homework about the position in which you are applying. Anyone can take a look at a Cover Letter and tell if it's a generic letter or not. When hand mailing (or emailing) Cover Letters, they should always be addressed to of research the Superintendent and essay be professional. When attending a job fair, it is types of research proposals recommended that while prepping for the fair and seeking who will be there, create a cover letter for text questions a few specific schools you know you will be interviewing at, but always have the types of research basic generic one in your pocket for australia vision those schools you might not have planned to meet. Should you put your Cover Letter on special paper? I think it's a good idea to do this when meeting people face to face, but the majority of your Cover Letters will probably be sent electronically. Keep it simple Keep it Professional Spell Check #8230; Spell Check #8230; Spell Check Point out some key spots in your resume that you want to draw their attention to.

If your Cover Letter succeeds where you need it to, your Resume is the next item that should be designed to of research sell you above all others. The trick to any good Resume is brevity. Essay Vision. It's easy to proposals take a career, (short or long) and write a 6 page resume. The problem is that nobody will take the writing institute time to read it. Your resume should be one page.

Where we can debate on if this means one full sheet (front and back) or just a single side of a sheet is something we can leave for another blog post, it is important to craft, not write your resume. A resume has a single purpose. It is a document designed to get your interviewer to bring up conversation topics. Normally, in an interview situation, your resume is in front of the person across the table and as they are going through their list of generic questions, they are looking through your resume trying to get you to talk about your experiences. You don't have list everything you did on your resume, but you do have to make sure they see what you want them to see. There are a few standard sections to every resume.

These may include: Experiences, Awards and Recognitions, Background info, and Contacts. As with your Cover Letter, I suggest tailoring every resume to the position you are applying for. In our age of digital and paper resumes, you may choose to of research proposals have two different #8220;paper#8221; resumes. Relationship Thesis. One that you hand to types of research someone on actual paper, and then one that is sent as a PDF. The difference being that the digital document may include clickable hyperlinks to your online portfolio or other types of media you wish to bring attention to. Essay Australia Vision. Use your professional name . . . James, not Jim is always best. Types Proposals. Professional Emails and relationship thesis Websites are always a step ahead of #8220;@gmail#8221; or #8220;sites.google.com/#8230;#8221; Don't write in words that would not make sense to others.

If you are a manager, call yourself a manager. Do not add titles that make someone question what they are. We are now living in a world where having an online destination is no longer an option for many…Click To Tweet. Of Research Proposals. Before we go into essay the psychology answering the above question, take a moment and say these sentences out of research, loud a few times: Would you like to see my website? Would you like to australia see my portfolio? Would you like to see my CV? Depending on types of research proposals, the position you are applying for, you may choose a different one of these options to be your favorite. For example, when I'm talking about TeacherCast, I share my #8220;website.#8221; When someone is asking for relationship thesis a professional version of my past accomplishments, I share my #8220;portfolio.#8221; However, as a musician and musical professional, I would offer you the opportunity to take a look at types of research proposals my Curriculum Vitae #8220;CV.#8221; Here are three examples of creative writing in delhi, looking at similar information online: These three items are slightly different yet based on the person or potential employer I'm speaking with, I would give them a different place to learn more about of research proposals, my background. Relationship Thesis. The important thing to remember is types that we are now living in Professional, a world where having an online destination is no longer an option for types proposals many jobs.

If you are looking to get hired in a place that relies primarily on Professional Development-Education, Google Apps your website might be well suited on a Google Sites. If you are looking at of research a place that is Microsoft heavy, having your background info on a SWAY might not be a bad idea. Purchase your own domain name (yourname.com) Create a story with your content that walks a reader through your story. Have a clear call to essay the psychology action that attracts others to proposals you above all others they are researching. One of the Development-Education most important things you can do (in my opinion) is take time to figure out types of research, how Social Media works. I'm not saying that you must create the most popular twitter account on the planet, but simply by having a twitter account and learning how to take advantage of training in delhi, how it works is types of research one of the most important parts of being an educator these days. Professional. Twitter can and really should be thought of the worlds largest professional development converence on the planet that never goes to sleep.

By learning about hashtags, you can not only start to types of research see the world as an ever changing digital library but you will learn how to find just about any resource you need. My advice for anyone in education is to not attack social media, but learn how to use it to relationship your advantage. Figure out what hashtags fit your subject area. Learn the differences between a Facebook page and types of research proposals a Twitter profile. Learn the importance of joining a Google Plus community. All of essay australia vision, these things are important parts of your PLN and can ultimatly lead you to types of research proposals finding new opportunities to australia vision share your resume.

Get a Twitter account and follow a few hashtags Join a Google Plus community #8230; or better yet, START ONE Connect with others in your field and share resources Don't be afraid to of research proposals ask questions of those you don't know . . . they just may turn out to be life long friends. What really matters in the end is . . . What really matters in the end is Development-Education that you are comfortble with the documents you use while searching for your next career opportunity. It is types of research often said that you never know when your next interview will happen. I have been fortunate over vision the last few years to types of research proposals have several amazing opportunities put in front of me without the need for a traditional paper resume and australia based mostly on types proposals, my social and digital portfolios. It can not be over stated that you should take every advantage you can to romeo response essay showcase your talents on every platform available. Remember, these platforms are (just about) free and you should never past up opportunities to take advantage of FREE. What do you think #8230; please share your thoughts! I would love to know what you think on this topic. I'm sure you might agree with some of what is written here and I'm sure you might disagree with some of these items. Personally, I have never been a position to of research really hire someone in a professional position. However, I have been asked to a good reflection essay be on types of research proposals, hireing committies where I had the thesis opportunity to look over resumes and provide my opinion on someones potential to fill an open position.

Please take a moment below and leave a comment on your thoughts on this very important topic. How Education Technology Is Preparing Students For The Workforce Of Tomorrow. Social Movements and the Classroom: A Conversation with TJ Whitaker | @NJEA. Types. The Recovery Process: How Houston’s School District Plans on Moving Forward. Relationship. One additional piece of advice to everything above; less is more. When in doubt, leave it out. You can surely bring it up in your interview.

If you don#8217;t keep things to types proposals the point (one-page resume, one-page letter), you#8217;re going to Professional lose attention and increase your chances of your materials making the circular file.

Write My Paper -
Types of Proposals - Writing a Research Proposal - LibGuides at

essay gun rights High school student David sent me this research paper on gun rights. “I am pro 2A,” David asserts, “but my essay takes a slightly moderate stance.” I’m 2A, but? Uh-oh. In the types of research interests of his re-edumacation I asked young Master David if he would consent to having his magnum opus corrected graded by TTAG’s Armed Intelligentsia. He agreed. Your participation in this endeavor would be most appreciated. The Right to relationship, Keep and types of research proposals Bear. The date is March 30, 1981, in Washington D.C.

President Ronald Reagan waves to the psychology of infidelity, a crowd of reporters and civilians when suddenly six shots ring out, and the President’s limo speeds away. The news spreads fast. There has been an assassination attempt on the President. In the following days, weeks, and months, this event brought calls for stricter gun laws, and renewed the debate over whether the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms . . . There is of research, no doubt that guns are an integral part of American history. From the a good essay smoothbore muskets wielded by farmers in the Revolutionary War, to the M1 Garands carried by proposals, the valiant soldiers of the U.S. Thesis? Military in WWII, to the 5.56x45mm rounds being sent “downrange” from the barrels of M4s and types proposals M16s in Afghanistan as this is being written, guns were a necessary part in the creation of a good essay our nation and continue to proposals, play an important role in Development-Education protecting America abroad. But civilian ownership of guns in America is a dividing issue. At the of research center of the relationship debate is the proposals Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It reads: “A well regulated militia being necessary for the preservation of a free state, the right of the essay australia vision people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What is a militia?

Who are “the people?” Many questions arise after reading the text. Those in favor of gun control tend to believe that the Second Amendment protects the types of research proposals right to bear arms as a collective right, meaning one reserved for the military. Those who support gun rights believe that the Second Amendment is meant to protect the right of individuals to bear arms. Also, there is debate as to whether this amendment has a fixed or evolving meaning, whether the Professional specific intent of the Founders should control it’s current application. The ability of the government to regulate the of research sale, possession, and relationship use of firearms grew controversial in the years leading up to the American Revolution. The British realized that organized armed colonists could resist their oppressive regime, and began confiscating their weapons. One such effort to capture colonial arms and ammunition in Massachusetts sparked the Revolutionary War.

Once the war was over, and the Framers set about of research proposals, drafting the Bill of text response essay questions Rights, they wanted to ensure that the government could not confiscate citizens’ arms, leading to the Second Amendment. The Revolution and the civilian militias provided the primary context for the Second Amendment. The debate about of research proposals, whether the creative training in delhi Second Amendment protected an individual right began in the Jacksonian era, when in response to types proposals, the disarmament of British citizens in the mid to late 18th Century, legal experts began to vision, describe the importance of the types of research individual right (Tucker). The first laws that expressly prohibited certain individuals from owning firearms were passed soon after the Civil War, when Southern states enacted laws prohibiting blacks from owning firearms (Mississippi). These laws were upheld by romeo response, the Supreme Court, on the ground that the types of research Second Amendment only prevented the federal government, not the essay states, from restricting citizen’s rights.

But later the types Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause made laws prohibiting firearms ownership by essay the psychology of infidelity, certain groups of people unconstitutional (Linder). Then, in types proposals the early 20th Century, following the infamous St Valentine’s Day Massacre, where gangsters with automatic weapons killed seven members of a rival gang, federal legislation was passed regulating several types of “dangerous weapons” rather than classes of people. The unified “gun control movement” known today got its start in the 1970’s. In 1974, The National Council to Control Handguns was formed, later renamed after James Brady, President Reagan’s Press Secretary who was permanently injured during the assassination attempt on the President. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence is one of gun control’s largest and most ardent supporters. Essay? On the opposing side is the National Rifle Association, or NRA. Founded in 1871 as a marksmanship program for types, civilians and soldiers alike, the NRA had opposed stricter gun laws since the early 1900’s, but in the 1970’s they shifted their focus to actively lobbying against creative writing training in delhi increased regulation (Gun Control, CQ). This history can be traced through several major Supreme Court cases regarding the issue. The first of these cases is Presser v. Illinois in proposals 1885.

In this case, Mr. Presser organized an armed march of 400 German Americans through the streets in Chicago, where it was illegal for armed groups to parade without a permit. Professional Development-Education? Presser thought this was unconstitutional, on proposals, the grounds that it violated the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that the relationship law was constitutional, because the Second Amendment only of research, protected citizens’ rights from restriction by the federal government (Sommers). The second case to arise was United States v. Miller, in 1939. Two men were transporting a sawed-off, double-barreled shotgun across state boundaries without paying the necessary National Firearms Act (NFA) tax. When they were arrested, they were released because the lower court believed that the NFA was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the men were guilty, because at the time a shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches was not associated with the type of militia activity protected by the Amendment and essay australia therefore Congress could regulate the possession of such weapons (Sommers).

The third case to come to types proposals, the Supreme Court on the issue of gun control was United States v. Lopez in thesis 1995. A Texas high school student was carrying a handgun within a high school. Types Proposals? Under the recently enacted Gun-Free School Zone Act, carrying a firearm inside of creative writing training institute a school was a federal crime. The Supreme Court found the law unconstitutional, on federalism and commerce clause grounds. Federalism is the system central to American democratic theory that separates power between the federal and state governments. Under this system, criminal law within the states is for proposals, the states themselves to control, outside of the federal government’s power. The commerce clause is part of Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution.

The commerce clause allows Congress to regulate commerce “Among the Professional states.” Since the Gun-Free School Zone Act does not pertain to interstate commerce, Congress exceeded its powers. The fourth case to of research, come before the Supreme Court was District of the psychology Columbia v. Heller in 2008. Of Research Proposals? A D.C. man wanted to own a handgun for home defense, but believed he was effectively prevented from doing so because of D.C.’s law requiring guns in the home be kept “unloaded, locked, or disassembled.” In a pivotal decision and a victory for gun rights advocates, the essay the psychology of infidelity Supreme Court ruled that the of research proposals law was unconstitutional because it was an unreasonable restriction on the Second Amendment rights of D.C. citizens. Under this ruling, the individual right to keep and bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment. The fifth case was McDonald v. Chicago in relationship 2010. Types Of Research Proposals? Similar to Heller, a Chicago man wanted to buy a handgun for home defense, but he could not do so because Chicago banned handguns. The Supreme Court found Chicago’s law unconstitutional, and relationship thesis established that states could not infringe upon the individual’s rights under the types Second Amendment (McDonald v. Chicago).

State laws governing the private ownership of guns vary greatly. However, there are a few federal laws regarding this issue which govern all the states. The first major federal law regarding gun control is the 1934 National Firearms Act. Conceived as a response to essay vision, the organized crime epidemic, the NFA regulated several types of weapons: machine guns, guns which fire more than one round per pull of the trigger; short barreled rifles (SBRs), rifles with barrels less than 16 inches; short barreled (or “sawed off”) shotguns, shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches; and silencers, devices that affix to the muzzle of types of research proposals a weapon and reduce the loudness of the sound made when firing. Professional? In order to own such weapons, a $200 dollar tax had to be paid and significant paperwork completed to have the weapon registered (Sommers). The next major law enacted is the aptly named Gun Control Act of 1968. This established the types proposals Federal Firearms License system, putting an end to mail order firearms like the one that was used to assassinate President John F. Kennedy.

In 1986, the Firearm Owner’s Protection Act was passed, which made machine guns manufactured after 1986 illegal for civilian ownership. For other guns, it included a “Safe Passage” provision, so that someone who is traveling from one state to relationship thesis, another cannot be incarcerated for a firearms charge in a state with strict gun laws, if they are just passing through. Enacted in 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, also named after James Brady, requires persons to undergo a background check before purchasing a handgun. In 1994, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban was passed, which banned firearms with ‘military features’ such as a pistol grip or flash suppressor (a device which affixes to the muzzle of a weapon and types reduces the visual signature of the weapon when firing) on a rifle, and restricted “high capacity” magazines. The ban included a “sunset clause,” essentially an Professional Development-Education, expiration date, causing the ban to types of research proposals, end in 2004. Many attempts have been made to romeo, renew the ban, including one led by Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012, however, all such efforts have failed. Some individual states, however, have passed their own Assault Weapons Bans, while other states have preempted such legislation from of research proposals, being passed in the future (Zimring). Gun control is not an issue exclusive to the United States. But in most other countries, gun ownership is more heavily regulated than in the US.

Such restrictions are not always effective in Professional Development-Education lowering crime. Russia has very strict gun laws, including banning all weapons except for long barreled shotguns and some BB guns from civilian possession. Yet Russia had 21,603 murders in 2009, compared to 13,636 murders in types of research the US in the same year, even though, Russia’s population is less than half that of the US, with about 143 million people compared to 313 million in essay vision the US (Flintoff). In the United States, gun ban legislation is very controversial, and outright bans have been proposed only in the context of types proposals “assault weapons.” The history of banning assault weapons raises several key questions, foremost among them, are gun bans really effective? Do they reduce gun violence? In a study on training institute in delhi, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of of research proposals 1994, Christopher S. Koper finds that “most survey evidence on the actual use of AWs (Assault Weapons) suggests that offenders rarely use AWs in crime. In a 1991 national survey of Professional adult state prisoners, for example, 8% of the inmates reported possessing a “military-type” firearm at some point in the past (Beck et al., 1993, p. 19). Yet only types proposals, 2% of offenders who used a firearm during their conviction offense reported using an AW for that offense (calculated from pp. 18, 33), a figure consistent with the and juliet text essay police statistics cited above. Similarly, while 10% of adult inmates and of research 20% of juvenile inmates in vision a Virginia survey reported having owned an of research proposals, AW, none of the adult inmates and only 1% of the juvenile inmates reported having carried them at crime scenes (reported in Zawitz, 1995, p. 6).”

Proponents of the questions ban argue that such weapons have no sporting application, and should be kept out of the hands of civilians. Types Of Research? Mary M. Cheh, a D.C. councilmember, summed up her opinion during our interview of essay of infidelity her in one phrase: “No one needs an assault rifle!” But if an assault weapons ban, even if enacted, can affect only types of research proposals, a very small percentage of crimes, what other solutions are there? And what is the creative training institute in delhi best way to prevent criminal use of more commonly used guns, like your basic handgun. One legislative solution is to target how criminals get their guns. While most guns are originally obtained through legal acquisition, approximately five of every six firearms used in crime was illegally obtained by that criminal.

This means that something goes amok when the types proposals gun is in the secondary market, either through theft, “lying and buying” where the essay the psychology of infidelity purchaser lies about whether they are prohibited from owning a firearm, or being sold on the black market (Ridgeway). The National Tracing Center compiles information about proposals, firearms so that in relationship the event one is used in a crime, law enforcement has information that could help trace the of research firearm legal purchase history. This makes it easier for Development-Education, law enforcement to identify illegal gun trafficking. But what is the best way to stop individual criminals from getting guns? While there will always be acts of violence that cannot be prevented, what are the common sense steps our society could take? Currently, the ATF requires FFL (Federal Firearms License) dealers to keep a record of: the name and of research address of the person from institute in delhi, whom the FFL received the firearm; the name of the manufacturer and importer (if any) of the firearm; the model of the firearm; the serial number of the firearm; the type of firearm (pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, receiver, frame, etc); and the caliber or gauge of the firearm (Farago). Also, all gun sales through FFLs, meaning all gun sales except private sales between residents of the same state, require the prospective buyer to undergo an FBI background check.

Third, a person may not transfer (loan, sell, rent) a firearm to another person if they suspect the buyer is prohibited from possessing a firearm (Firearms). Fourth, straw purchasing, where someone who is prohibited from possessing a firearm uses a surrogate buyer to act for them, is a crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison (Straw). These requirements, however, apply only where the seller is or uses an FFL, not to private sales between individuals in the same state. Types Proposals? Requiring background checks for all sales might help reduce certain kinds of gun violence, like the instances of thesis domestic violence in which a person under a restraining order was able to purchase a gun without undergoing a background check. So the question is why not require background checks for private sales between residents of the same state? Opponents argue that this would require background checks for sales between family members, and types of research that in some areas the nearest FFL is essay vision, inaccessible.

Some of these issues were addressed in a bipartisan bill introduced in of research proposals 2013 by Senators Joe Manchin and creative training institute Pat Toomey. Types? This bill required background checks for all gun sales with exceptions for family members. The bill was defeated in the Senate (Blake). Theft remains a large factor in how criminals obtain firearms. A fix for creative institute in delhi, this might lie in safe storage requirements. Of Research? In an article from one of the essay australia vision NRA’s publications,American Rifleman, B. Gil Horman writes: “It is important for shooters to store their guns in a safe manner. A gun in a drawer or on a shelf does not qualify as safe in of research any way, even if it’s unloaded and romeo text response essay questions the ammunition is stored somewhere else.”(Horman) Unfortunately, not all gun owners practice safe storage precautions. Incentives linking gun purchases with discounts for safe storage equipment would be a first step, or gun owners could be required by types proposals, law to australia vision, keep their guns stored when not in of research use, although this would likely be unpopular and decidedly necessary, seeing as most people advocate practicing safe storage in vision one form or another. Another possibility is more and of research better education on using and storing firearms safely. Common sense suggests that educating people about australia, gun safety will help avoid accidental deaths.

A few gun safety programs already exist, foremost among them is the NRA’s Eddie Eagle GunSafe program. Developed with the help of teachers, law enforcement specialists, and psychologists, to name a few, the Eddie Eagle program has been taught to more than 26 million children K-3rd grade (Eddie). Finally, some believe those who are concealed carriers can help stop crime, and there are situations where a concealed carry permit holder who was present as a crime unfolded did help to types proposals, deter or prevent the crime. Unfortunately, not all people who have guns for self defense are sufficiently trained to act quickly and Development-Education safely to stop a crime, and their firearms are sometimes used accidentally against innocents. All 50 states “allow” concealed carry, although in of research proposals 10 states local authorities have discretion whether to issue the permit (a de facto ban), while in essay australia 40 states any individual who meets the state requirements can obtain a concealed carry permit. Training requirements vary greatly from state to types proposals, state, but one possibility is a national concealed carry law that would establish uniform requirements. The Supreme Court has ruled definitively that the Second Amendment guarantees an writing institute, individual right “to keep and bear arms.” But how can our society balance this right with the need for proposals, public safety? How can our nation respect the Professional Development-Education culture of hunting and shooting sports in types of research proposals some states, while other areas face high levels of urban gun violence? If gun control legislation is politically unpopular, then what can be done to address gun violence? While some proposals remain either too controversial, or ineffective, there is more consensus around gun control legislation that focuses on criminals and essay vision how they get their guns.

Better laws and enforcement tools around trafficking and straw purchasing, preventing theft, ensuring background checks for all purchases, and education could make a difference. Guns are an important part of proposals our history. Guns can be used for sport, for protection, and they can hold sentimental value like other prized objects. But they can also be used to romeo and juliet text response questions, hurt innocent people. Types Of Research? Owning a gun is a right that carries a heavy responsibility.

In his essay On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs, David Grossman writes about the role of the “sheepdog,” those who choose to protect the wider population from attack by “wolves.” He warns: “If you want to be a sheepdog … then you must make a conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip, and prepare yourself for that toxic, corrosive moment when the wolf comes knocking at the door.” Because of the inherent risk involved in owning and Development-Education using guns, citizens who choose to own guns must be responsible in exercising their constitutional rights. Today, too many citizens on both sides of the debate demonize the types other side. Our communities need to find space for open and honest dialogue. This is an issue that needs respect. All citizens need to a good reflection, listen to both sides with an open mind and address the best arguments across the spectrum to find effective solutions. Blair, J. Pete, et al. Active Shooter Events and Response. N.p.: CRC, 2013. Print.

Blake, Aaron. “Manchin-Toomey Gun Amendment Fails.” Washington Post 17 Apr. 2013: n. pag. Of Research Proposals? Print. Cheh, Mary M. Personal interview. 14 Jan. Essay Australia Vision? 2014. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. Proposals? HELLER. Australia Vision? The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of of research proposals Law. 09 December 2013. http://www.oyez.org/cases/ 2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290. “Gun Control.” Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2013.

Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Romeo Text Essay? Web. 8 Dec. 2013. “Gun Control.” CQ Researcher 15 June 2013. Web. 8 Dec. 2013. Horman, B. Gil. “Safe Gun Storage Options.” American Rifleman: n. pag. Print.

Linder, Doug. “The Right to types proposals, Bear Arms.” Exploring Constitutional Law. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School, 2014. Web. 26 Feb. 2014. http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/ projects/ftrials/conlaw/ beararms.htm. Magoon, Kekla. Gun Control. Edina: Abdo, 2008. Essay The Psychology Of Infidelity? Print. MCDONALD v. CHICAGO. Types? The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law.

08 December 2013. http://www.oyez.org/cases/ 2000-2009/2009/2009_08_1521. “Mississippi Black Codes.” Center for History and New Media. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. Professional? 2014. Types Of Research Proposals? https://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/ 122/recon/code.html. Ridgeway, Greg, Glenn L. Pierce, Anthony A. Braga, George Tita, Garen Wintemute and Wendell Roberts. Strategies for Disrupting Illegal Firearm Markets: A Case Study of Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. http://www.rand.org/pubs/ technical_reports/TR512.

Sommers, Michael A. The Individual Rights and of infidelity Civic Responsibility: The Right to Bear Arms. New York: Rosen Publishing Group, 2001. Print. “Straw Purchasing.” Don’t Lie for the Other Guy. NSSF, n.d. Of Research Proposals? Web. 30 Jan. 2014. Tucker, St. George. Essay? Blackstone’s Commentaries: With Notes of Reference, to the Constitution and proposals Laws, of the Federal Government of the United States; and of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Vol. Text Response? 1. Philadelphia: William Young Birch and Abraham Small, 1803. Of Research Proposals? Print. 86 Responses to Please Grade This High School Senior’s Gun Rights Essay. It’s amazing to me that so much time passed between the founding of this country and these modifying laws.

Hopefully today’s votes will begin the reversal of the anti-gun people/ I read most of it, skimmed some of it. Looked okay to me, a little dry. I learned a few things. Good for you kid.

The history of creative in delhi gun control in of research proposals the US is murky indeed. God Damn. For anything that’s not law school, I’d give an A. The leftist SCOTUS rendered a decision concerning individual citizen’s right to bear arms in their decision concerning the restrictive laws of Washington, D.C. This was the essay the psychology of infidelity first case I know of that SCOTUS has come down very clearly for proposals, individual rights of ownership of arms, apart from any participation in a “militia.” This cannot be understated since it will be quoted and essay vision built upon on of research proposals, in future decisions. Yes, but don’t ever forget that Heller was a “5 to 4” decision. This fact is ominous in it’s portentions. It underscores the facts that, not only can 4 Justices of the Supreme Court not comprehend what it meant by the simple phrase, “Shall not be infringed,” but that we are only one leftist President’s Supreme Court appointment away from losing our 2nd Amendment rights!…..

Ah, Marbury Vs. Madison and judicial review; Marshall really screwed the Republic with that one. Yep. Development-Education? The other Thomas Jefferson believed that any one branch having final say as to the constitutionality of proposals a law would simply devolve, in time, into Development-Education tyranny. For the most part, very factual, and the instances where the author is injecting his own opinion are noted as such, or are offered up as questions to the reader. However, there is one very glaring paragraph that made me smack my head, colloquially known as “Facepalming.” Through the essay, there is of research, very thorough citation for any facts stated, but the following paragraph states a “fact” without any citation, likely because you can not find any supporting evidence. “Finally, some believe those who are concealed carriers can help stop crime, and there are situations where a concealed carry permit holder who was present as a crime unfolded did help to deter or prevent the crime. Unfortunately, not all people who have guns for relationship thesis, self defense are sufficiently trained to act quickly and safely to stop a crime, and their firearms are sometimes used accidentally against innocents.”

Without facts to back it up, this paragraph needs to types of research, be modified. There is plenty of proof showing that when someone considered a “Good Guy with a Gun” shows up to intervene in an attempted assault, robbery, rape, murder, or other violent felonious act, the “good guy” has a nearly impeccable rate of deterring or reducing the extent of the “Bad Guy’s” crime. There is creative training in delhi, little to of research proposals, no evidence of an armed intervener making an already felonious situation worse. Thank you, that is what I attempted to say, below, with less clarity. Relationship? I noticed our young man did not take a position, simply stating facts (or assumptions presented as facts). Some adult research will do him well, and he should start from a neutral position if he wishes to come to a rational decision. Young man, you have a future, here! Do not accept lies, find out for yourself. And remember, the types proposals 2A says “shall not be infringed”, which makes it obvious that all current gun control, city, state, or federal, is clearly unconstitutional, on a good reflection, its face. Try addressing that on your next dissertation. It was looking very good until that point.

Concealed carriers absolutely knock it out of the park in terms of self defense. Lack of training? Please. CCW holders are more accurate than police and are less likely to types proposals, shoot the wrong target. CCers shooting the wrong target?

I’m sure somebody has, but I’d wager it’s in the single digits annually. LEOs shooting the wrong target? According to police investigating themselves, it’s done fatally at writing institute in delhi about 3-4x the rate LEOs die on duty, and most of the types of research dead LEOs are from vehicle crashes, so let’s just round it up and say a cop is 10x as likely to shoot and kill an innocent citizen as he is to get shot and killed by and juliet response questions, a non-cop. The number of citizens shot but not killed by LEOs has to be in types the thousands. We’ve got 800,000 armed LEOs and several million CCers, so on an individual basis, each LEO is much more of a threat than each CCer. My sentiment was the same pretty much. Good until that one paragraph; overall, still decent. There’s also this little book called “More Guns, Less Crime” by John R. Lott, Jr. that our essay writer should familiarize himself with and revise as necessary. I regards to concealed carry, “..sometimes their firearms are accidentally used against innocents.” Citation needed.

Do CPL holders “accidentally” use their firearms against innocents at reflection essay a higher rate than police? “If gun control legislation is politically unpopular, then what can be done to address gun violence?” Why does gun violence need to be specifically addressed? Why not all violence? Is getting killed by of research proposals, a gun somehow worse than being killed by a knife, bat, or bare hands? This has been one of the key tenets of Professional Development-Education our gun-rights arguments. Stop talking about gun violence and start talking about all violence.

When you do, you will find that you will find solutions that will reduce all violence, including gun violence. Until you do, the best you can do is cause gun violence to change into other forms of proposals violence, with no reduction or even an increase in violence overall. This is supported by several examples around the world. Could use a little more research on the Concealed Carry part, but I can’t blame somebody for not knowing the romeo and juliet text response stats on types proposals, armed civilians stopping criminals. Essay? It’s not like it’s easy information to proposals, find, even with google. Otherwise,Pretty damn good, but I’m betting it’s not going to get as good a grade as it deserves. Oh, damn, I did not think of that. I want to know what grade that paper got.

It should have been an *A* by any standards, considering research and consideration, but may be a lower grade because of anti-gun extremism among public schoolteachers. Good luck, dude! As an “essay” it is poorly written. It fails to take a clear stance in any regard. It also fails to provide strong evidence in support of a view point. As far as a strictly essay grade? C+ to a B-.

It is well researched but lacking critical essay elements such as a clear, concise thesis and multiple examples to prove each argument in favor of said thesis. As a research paper? B+ to A-. The research is Professional Development-Education, good and types of research proposals it does provide a balanced statement of the a good reflection essay facts. It does not provide any deep insights, summation, conclusions etc that would push it in to A/A+ (which is and should be reserved for exceptional works that go above and beyond).

This is not coming from proposals, a teacher but someone who took university level essay courses. So depending on the school, system and views of the teacher they could grade higher or lower. My advice? It does need a rewrite. There are good examples, but it needs a thesis. Use the examples to create supporting arguments that support that thesis. Currently it is thesis, just a mass of facts, events and of research proposals anecdotes. Not an essay. Cops are armed civilians.

For people not employed by the government, use CITIZENS. Here is a good source: All supported with facts and sources. I take some issue with the last paragraph. I understand why the author included it, but this really is a no compromise issue. There is no point in having an Professional, ‘open and honest dialogue’ with people dedicated to curtailing a fundamental right outlined in the Constitution. Anymore than we should have a dialogue about making a state religion, banning newspapers or quartering soldiers in private homes. Any change comes from us, not culture warriors and people that hate and despise the fundamental right to keep and bear arms. While I agree with the spirit of types of research proposals your post, I think there are plenty of Development-Education things that can be tried to reduce crime without infringing on types proposals, anyone’s rights to arms.

I also think that we “gun guys” NEED a seat at that table! It is important to have those who understand guns and essay the Constitution in the dialogue so that we can avoid blind alleys, ineffective proposals and, of course, infringements on the rights of the innocent. You keep making solid arguments then weakening them with a nod to the opposition. I would focus on making clear claims about what kinds of legislation are effective cite statistics to prove that the opposing opinion is less effective/correct. An example would be background checks. ‘Common sense’ dictates that 5/6 criminals not buying their guns from a source that the government has control over means that federal legislation cannot significantly impact criminals purchasing weapons. On a different note, not everything needs legislation. Types Of Research Proposals? You mention the many groups advocating “safe storage” of guns yet you assume that the only solution to get less people to leave guns out in the open is to thesis, pass a law. This might seem like a ridiculous complaint but you should probably mention that not everyone believes the time to get a gun out of a safe is reasonable when their life is at risk. I agree that you are weakening your own arguments in the spirit of being inclusive. Proposals? For example: “…Requiring background checks for all sales might help reduce certain kinds of gun violence,”

The anti crowd strongly believe that to be true, but even the smallest amount of thought proves it to be untrue. You even site a 5/6 rate of criminal activity that strongly opposes the idea that more background checks will make a difference on criminal activity. The very shortest answer is in delhi, if the current background check system isn’t doing what it is types of research, supposed to be doing how would expanding it suddenly make it work as planned? It’s a report, not a position paper — if he didn’t include various views, he’d deserve a D at text questions best. The 2nd amendment was incorrectly quoted. Good point, I am ashamed I missed that. I therefore change my grade to a C- What? Are we talking about commas? I have heard all manner of of research different commas.

Which is romeo and juliet, right seems to not make a difference to me. To be more specific, it should be “to the security” not “for the preservation”. Can’t blame the kid. It probably said that in his school supplied textbook. He forgot Dredd Scott.

As Chief Justice Taney said, if Scott was ruled a citizen, “[I]t would give them (blacks) the full liberty to of research, keep and carry arms wherever they went.” Gun control has ALWAYS been racist. When will the discriminated against learn? When we get the essay government and unions OUT of our schools and AWAY from our kids. He also neglected to note the numerous times that SCOTUS has listed the Second right along with the types of research proposals First, Fourth, and a good reflection essay Fifth as protecting individual rights. For a high school effort, I’m seriously impressed, so an A — if he’d caught these missing elements, I’d go A+. He also neglected to note the numerous times that SCOTUS has listed the Second right along with the First, Fourth, and Fifth as protecting individual rights. They are all individual rights. Freedom of religion is an individual right. Freedom of proposals speech is an individual right. Freedom of the press is an individual right.

Freedom to assemble is an Professional, individual right. Freedom to petition the government is an of research proposals, individual right. Freedom from training in delhi, having troops quartered in your house is an individual right. Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure is an individual right. The right to due process is an individual right. Freedom from double jeopardy is an individual right.

Freedom from self-incrimination is an individual right. Freedom from eminent domain claims without just compensation is an individual right. The right to of research proposals, a speedy trial is an individual right. The right to a public trial is an individual right. The right to essay the psychology of infidelity, a jury trial is an individual right.

The right to confront witnesses is an individual right. The right to counsel is an individual right. Freedom from types, excessive bail is an individual right. Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment is an individual right. But it amazes me that some people think that the right to keep and bear arms is not an individual right, but that it is a collective right! Well put and to the point. One key problem with universal background checks is in reflection the enforcement of that requirement. Of Research? How do you ensure that all gun transactions go through background checks? The only effective way is through gun registration, which has been abused many times in the past by governments. Amazing how one goes to an anti gun website that actually shows the failure of gun control, especially registration.

Why is it that this small sample of relationship gun control countries (206 total countries in the list) have less than a 25% registration of their guns? Explain again with any logic how one gets the types of research criminals to register their guns, is it like a buy back with blanket amnesty, do tell? Guns / Registered / % of registered. Brazil 16,200,000 / 5,200,000 / 32.1% Canada 14,450,688 / 7,514,358 / 52.0% China 40,000,000 / 680,000 / 1.7% Cuba 545,000 / 58,150 / 10.7% Guatemala 1,650,000 / 393,996 / 23.9% Japan 710,000 / 413,096 / 58.2% Mexico 15,500,000 / 2,824,231 / 18.2% N Ireland 380,000 / 141,393 / 37.2%

Netherlands 510,000 / 333,000 / 65.3% Russia 12,750,000 / 5,000,000 / 39.2% S Africa 5,950,000 / 3,737,676 / 62.8% Venezuela 2,825,000 / 925,000 / 32.7% Totals avg.

111,470,688 / 27,220,900 / 24.4% Oh wait, further review of data as of 9/20/2014 shows the following………… 119 Countries reported registration rates! 296,301,508 guns / 80,398,537 registered = 27.1% Do you really think that registration rates would be any different in the US, nah, WORSE, we tell government to FO, doubt me, review the numbers for the Connecticut NY registration BS just this last year, LOL! Of course the 76 other countries with over Professional Development-Education, 399 mil guns didn’t report their registration rates, probably too embarrassed to admit how little control they really have over their subjects! Man, that there registration REALLY SUCKS at preventing violent crime by the bad guys eh! Background checks ARE registration!

Anyone who uses the term gun violence is claiming a gun is alive and the root cause of violence, only the clinically insane do that! There is no equation to balance safety by ursurping ones rights for the actions of the types of research few criminals! He neglected Haynes vs US 390, 85, 1968 the 5th amendment proving where 85% of gun control laws dont apply as a punishment to any of the 10 categories of bad guys identified in USC18 Sec 922! He neglected the studies, most notably by GAO General Accounting Office posted 3/21/2001 showing how agents went to Professional Development-Education, 5 different states using fake identification and bought guns using fake identification 100% of the time, He neglected the BATF refusal to prosecute more than 1% of the 2.056 mil rejected!

He neglected the USDOJ Firearms use by Offenders Nov 2001 (18,326 felons surveyed in types of research proposals 3 different regions) USDOJ Background Check and relationship Firearm Transfer 2008-2010 reports identifying that in todays numbers….95.52% of bad guys dont even attempt to buy from a licensed source to begin with, 3.84% buy from a retail source using fake identifications, and .64% buy from gun shows! In that USDOJ data it shows clearly that 50% of the 95.52% bad guys who dont even attempt to buy from of research proposals, a licensed source to begin with, get their guns from straw buyers/family members, and the psychology the other 50% by street buys from other criminals/theft! He forgot the USDOJ Firearms theft data 2012 report demonstrating a -60.9% reduction in types of research proposals guns stolen per year from 1988-2012, (511k to 199k) yet only essay, a -4.34% reduction in property thefts where the majority of of research proposals guns are stolen during that same time frame. He forgot the MSNBC 2002 report showing how 18 states w mandatory storage laws only a good reflection essay, showed a -26% reduction in guns stolen, but no viable or credible proof this was due to storage laws! So much for the inferences that all gun owners are irresponsible as he doesnt have any proof all gun owners are irresponsible, which is really a projection of how the demokrats pushing said storage law themselves act, irresponsibly! He forgot how during that same time fram that the number of guns in law abiding civilians hands increased by 42% (per NSSF NICS data, over proposals, 90 million guns), yet FBI UCR data shows a -39% reduction in violent crime rate and a -52% reduction in murders by illegal use of a gun, all the greatest reductions of ANY country during that same time frame, the majority of them gun ban paradises! He fails to acknowledge the gun control crowd has never given up any of the essay affirmed rights they value in types 60 plus years of reflection essay gun control, where as there are 22,000 gun control laws that 85% only affect and only punish the law abiding gun owners and not the actual criminals! Why should gun owners compromise anymore with a minority group who is so selfish, intolerant, and promoting the lie of gun control of only the law abiding reduces violence by types of research, the bad guys, which it never has and never will? Why does he refuse to acknowledge the 1.221 mil people wanted on open felony warrants per FBI DENI, underfunded by the government to track and capture, of institute which 50% are probably as severely mentally ill as are 50% of the proposals current 2.7 mil prisoners per psychiatrists and writing in delhi criminologists! Why does he refuse to acknowledge the effect HIPPA laws have on types proposals, reporting the mentally ill and felons into the NICS database which NICS Operations reports shows only reflection essay, 5.1 mil in the database July 2014 out of estimates of 31 mil + combined?

Why does he refuse to acknowledge that 93.8% of all rejections of the background check are FALSE POSITIVES over types proposals, the 17 years of the reflection essay Brady Law? Why does he not know of the NICS operations reports showing an of research proposals, average of only 45 bad guys prosecuted per year? Why does he refuse to acknowledge the government studies and data demonstrating 97.3% of all killings by illegal use of a gun are committed by thesis, career criminals, gang members, suiciders, crazies domestic violence abusers, which arent law abiding gun owners! Why does he not acknowledge the USDOJ data showing 30% of the population, not white, commit 87% of of research proposals all the a good reflection violent crimes, and votes predominantly demokrat? Why does he infer all gun owners are untrained when the government data demonstrate if that were true that the numbers fo collateral shootings would skyrocket? Got another 12 pages of summarized government data and facts the young man didnt dig enough into, much less review. I would give the types proposals young man an incomplete!

You do know that most Americans have around a 90 IQ? Meaning that all those great stats you listed mean next to nothing to the average American citizen. Gotta find a way to dumb it down so the flouride drinking mouth-breathers will get on board. Essay Of Infidelity? In other words, if it’s not being talked about during an types proposals, NFL pre-game show or in the middle of a Taylor Swift concert, nobody is thesis, going to give a fuck. Yet the young man is obviously above a 90 IQ, hence my message to types, him is indeed appropriate! Hey! Be nice! The kid is essay australia, 18. I’m thinking he’ll do a lot (I mean a LOT) better 10 years from now. Damn fine first effort.

That was being nice, trust me on that! But as he wanted to post his opinion in public, why should we sugar coat it and of research encourage the direction of his work that is so obviously lacking? If this were a research paper for a sophomore course in college, I’d agree with you. But for high school, no, unless it was for australia, like half his grade in some course, no. My wife is of research proposals, a teacher of 31 years, and has had several students of exceptional ability, but they are not perfect, and essay vision they as a rule have all taken constructive critiicism and correction of their naievette better than most. So I have NO problem treating someone who wants to proposals, post their opinion in essay vision public as an types proposals, adult, which I did! Now it remains to a good reflection essay, be seen whether or not he is capable of thinking on of research, his own! I wouldn’t say he neglected or willfully refused to include information.

It was a high school research paper, not a doctoral thesis. He hit the the psychology of infidelity highlights and types of research the most pertinent information on an infinitely broad topic. I also think he was trying to write it as objectively as he could. And Juliet Essay Questions? The citations were lacking somewhat, and of research proposals there were a few points that he probably thought were common knowledge but came off as fact. The concealed carry part was abysmal. It wouldn’t be hard to quote a few news stories the Professional Development-Education way American Rifleman does every month to paint a picture, while citing a news story to back up his “injured bystanders” claim if he were trying to be objective and give both sides.

I’m not a teacher, but I was a history major and wrote a TON of research papers. By undergraduate standards I’d give him a C, but since he’s a high school kid, and he made a good effort, I’ll give him a B-. Content aside this kid needs a writing tutor. I get that it’s a research paper but it would be nice if he had the capability of of research asserting his own voice. Creativity is lacking in his word choice, bland structuring, very little to get and hold attention. Good start, young man.

I give it a C+. Now. Dig a little deeper into U.S. v Miller. If I remember correctly, neither miller nor his attorney were notified of the date of arguments before the SCOTUS. Then here’s this statement. “No one needs an assault rifle!” It’s not a bill of of infidelity needs, it’s a bill of rights. My last point on your paper.

You wrote; ” How can our nation respect the types of research culture of relationship hunting and shooting sports in some states, while other areas face high levels of types urban gun violence? If gun control legislation is politically unpopular, then what can be done to address gun violence?” Owning firearms is training institute in delhi, not about hunting or shooting sports cultures. In the Federalist Papers, it’s very clear that the founders meant for the common man to be armed as a bulwark against a tyrannical government. Worse case scenario, the citizens march on the government, and with arms, overthrow it to form a new one. There is no such thing as “gun violence”. It’s all about the perpetrator.

The gun, at proposals times, is the closest tool. Finally, I would cite through the excellent book, More guns, Less crime, as a source of where millions of common citizens use firearms to defend themselves and others. It happens a lot. Keep up the good work. David, I’ll give you a B. This was decently written and Professional well-researched, but after your introductory section, which raised the issue as an types proposals, important moral, philosophical, and political question, you buried us under a bunch of varied data and romeo and juliet text response questions conflicting case histories, and at the end did not come to any sort of definite conclusion. Proposals? If this is an “argument” paper, you came to the conclusion that “this is an the psychology of infidelity, argument.” I’m certain that other readers will note that there is a definite answer to the “what is a militia?” question. It’s defined in Article 2, section 8 of the of research proposals U.S. Constitution and further described in creative training institute in delhi the Militia act of 1903.

Any male citizen between the ages of 17 and 45 who is NOT a member of the uniformed services (including National Guard) is types, a member of the “Unorganized Militia.” Forgive me if I’m misquoting here, I don’t have the source in front of me. Romeo Response Essay? While the militia is under obligation to keep and bear arms in the interests of the public (as in “common defense”) it is totally clear that this shows up as an individual right, as recognized by proposals, the Heller decision. But to address the core of the Professional issue, being armed is a way of of research being powerful. It’s not the only way, and it may not be the best way, but it’s inarguable and Professional Development-Education it’s unmistakable. The larger question that you bring up (and then dance around, and then refuse to answer) is about how power is of research proposals, supposed to be distributed in our Republic.

Is it supposed to be distributed widely, in the psychology of infidelity the hands of the individual citizens, with the types of research proposals authority of the government held in check against relationship thesis the will of the types of research proposals citizenry, or should power be held by a central Federalist government in proxy for “the people” broadly speaking? What do you think Thomas Jefferson would have said about that? Young man, that was excellent! A realistic and well researched commentary! The only thing missing was experience. I could be all manner of educational here, but let me, for the moment, just address the following: “Unfortunately, not all people who have guns for self defense are sufficiently trained to act quickly and safely to stop a crime, and creative training in delhi their firearms are sometimes used accidentally against innocents.” Why not give us some actual figures on of research proposals, whether, in a given (and actual) situation, the legally carried firearm was effectively used to relationship, stop a crime, or used accidentally against innocents. That is, IMHO, a common lie used to inflame anti-gun activists. How often does either event occur? You will be discouraged from such research, “it’s not important”, etc. It IS important, 10,000 used to prevent crime vs. one used accidentally against innocents makes the types of research decision easy.

The anti gun establishment will lie extensively to make you drop the subject. I say, go to the FBI figures, do some research outside the biased sources you seem to a good reflection essay, be using. But, again, for of research proposals, an 18-year-old, this was really exceptional. I am 68, and I respect your attempt. Actually, you hit the nail right on the head, sir. I had originally included the example of Nick Meli (Clackamas OR), but my teacher told me it was “not important”, ” anecdotal “, and ” made the paper too long “. I would prefer the “report” to romeo and juliet text response, argue a position, but lacking that he should cite more “laws” and the reasons for them, like firearms registration and the concealed carry regulations that were enacted so blacks and other minorities couldn’t carry guns.

Also, since he’s citing Miller 1939, he should mention that the US military did use SBS in trench warfare, but the government attorneys lied and said guns like that weren’t used and so are unusual. One of the worst SCOTUS decisions ever. Overall this is a good paper, especially from a high schooler. As Jarhead1982 notes there are a few areas that would ideally. need further research and expansion. Although, I see this as.

less a full report as I do a intro/summary of a lengthy (20 pgs+) research thesis. Bearing that in types proposals mind, this paper is still better. than a great many papers I’ve seen and gotten from college. My biggest critique is and juliet response, that there doesn’t seem to be a clearly. stated thesis. Without this it’s hard to types, know the context for. the report itself. For instance, this paper does not seem to. be making any argument, merely providing a generally history. If we take the relationship report as such then much of the information. others have noticed missing isn’t irrelevant by any stretch; but.

it could become a little superfluous. On the other hand, if an. argument for or against gun-control was intended then there. is a lot of data that would need to be added. Overall well written, but without a thesis statement of types of research proposals some kind. I don’t think I could give this more than a B+.

While I agree, I have to point out that we do not have the assignment, do not know what he was SUPPOSED to be doing. I don’t think there’s anything I can add to this. Nice job. As a high school research paper: quite a decent job there, actually. Nice collection of text response essay questions information, and pretty fair presentation of proposals/arguments on both sides of the types of research proposals controversy. I don’t know what standards you’re writing for, but having written a slew of (admittedly more technically focused) research papers, your opening could do with a better “road map” of where your paper is heading – you’ve got an okay start in relationship thesis your second paragraph, but as evidenced by the commenters before me mentioning having not read the types proposals whole thing or skimmed it, it could use a little more explicit “we’re going to go over X, Y and australia Z” to help the reader not feel lost (or have to read it twice).

Your last paragraph is types, rather weak, in that the relationship thesis call to citizens to “listen to both sides” isn’t actually really supported or explicitly mentioned anywhere else in the paper. I’m not going to get into the mires of the back-and-forth arguments for and against each proposed solution (I leave that to the other commenters, this IS the internet after all). However, I will point out a couple key assumptions you included, probably without thinking about them. “So the types of research proposals question is why not require background checks for private sales between residents of the same state?” – you (or rather the framer of essay australia vision this particular suggestion) have made the classic error of assuming something is either bad and should not be allowed, or good and should be required. Types? What if we change the word “required” to “allowed”? If there was an open version of the NICS system, where anyone could call and get a quick pass/fail check, what would be the potential benefits or drawbacks?

You use the term “gun violence” without actually defining it. Sadly, in the context of these types of creative writing institute in delhi arguments, it is actually necessary to differentiate between “violent criminal acts perpetrated with a gun”, “accidental injury or death due to a gun” and “the use of a gun to deter violent criminal acts” because the of research term “gun violence” has been known to be used to lump all three contexts together. Is “gun violence” something that needs to be independently addressed outside of “violence” generally? Guns make it EASIER to relationship thesis, commit violent acts, but the types proposals absence of of infidelity a gun does not PREVENT violent acts (see prisons for a prime example). Types Of Research Proposals? What types of violent scenarios would change, in what ways, if guns were absent from the picture? “While there will always be acts of violence that cannot be prevented, what are the Professional Development-Education common sense steps our society could take?” – you make the mistake of assuming a “common sense” approach is applicable to violent acts in our society.

Unfortunately, “common sense” is not actually a measure of the quality or effectiveness of any approach, especially in a very complex system like the types of research proposals society we live in. The easy (or easily explainable, or intuitive, or feel-good, aka “common sense”) answer to a complex problem usually has massive unintended consequences which may not be readily apparent, possibly for years. Relationship Thesis? You yourself managed to of research, find a refutation or counter-point for every “common sense” approach you listed. A “well-reasoned, researched” approach would almost always be far more favorable than any “common sense” one, in Professional Development-Education any situation. Sarcasm? Exsqueeze me? Damn fine. I concur in all. Still, for types, high school? damn fine. What is the point that you are trying to convey?

My biggest suggestion is that there does not appear to be a concrete conclusion. ‘Everybody should listen to each other’ is not a conclusion. Professional Development-Education? If the assignment is intended to be a history lesson, it is acceptable to follow the historical thread and look at how things have changed over time and why, but then the types proposals current concluding paragraphs are unnecessary and counterproductive. If it is Development-Education, intended to be an opinion piece (i.e. Types Of Research? pick an issue and make an evidence-based argument), then your conclusions are excessively wishy-washy. In either case, your conclusions need to be revised, and your essay updated to creative, support them properly. The other suggestion is types of research proposals, that you make numerous statements that are unsupported.

For example, “Better laws and romeo and juliet questions enforcement tools around trafficking and straw purchasing, preventing theft, ensuring background checks for types, all purchases, and education could make a difference.” How? What evidence do you have to support that view? Is there data that you can point to? If not, statements such as this need to be revised accordingly to indicate that you are expressing an opinion. Keep in mind these things apply to all good essay writing.

Pick an argument, form a hypothesis, back it up with evidence (DATA!), and make conclusions based on that evidence. Trying to straddle the fence by not really saying anything is (to a good teacher) a one-way ticket to a C. I concur with your assessment. Romeo Text Essay Questions? While the author does state several facts, the types proposals author only glances through them without expounding on creative writing training, each point. By providing more “meat” for the grist, this could have been a well thought out essay. The author needs to dig deeper–and, I read his essay twice just to make sure. I’m on a my phone and about to lose reception, sorry if this is proposals, a repost. Look at the militia acts of 1792 and google 10 us code 311.

Not bad at all; seems his idea of a “moderate stance” is to not be rabid, rater than being semi-grabber. This kid has a [hopefully bright] future involving language. Off to work on my Mosin-based 13 barrel Gatling; pix if I ever finish it… Even worse the romeo response second time I read it. It was really poorly written.

He draws conclusions without any supporting facts, has a tenuous grasp of history, and contradicts himself more than once. Better than me when I was 17. I am critical of the unfounded Concealed carry conclusions. But for types of research proposals, posting on a (rabid?) pro 2A site very good. We won’t crucify you like Dick Metcalf #128578; Howdy folks. I’m the author of this essay, and I’m more than happy to answer any questions y’all have. I’m a little late to the game, I know, but I’ll try and australia make up for that.

Let us know what grade you get. Good luck. I can find things to quibble about here. The paper is rough in of research spots and a bit unfocused. You have missed some major sources and used some obscure ones (I’m sorry, but “The Truth About Guns” is creative writing institute, not an proposals, authoritative source that you can cite in Development-Education an academic research paper).

But those are quibbles. For a high school paper this is really remarkable. You show real talent and of research you could go far if you work to relationship, develop it. I hope that doesn’t sound condescending. Of Research Proposals? Writing well takes a lot of practice and you haven’t lived long enough yet, but you are already well on the way. In scholarship terms, you should search harder for primary sources. You missed John Lott, Clayton Cramer, Gary Kleck, and Don Kates completely. All of them have written books that you should have read for a paper like this. In writing terms, you should do more to make the prose flow. Text? Try to imagine yourself giving a speech before an audience. Try to be organized about what you are trying to types of research, say, and lay the points out in a logical order.

Chronological order, order by topics, order by opposing views – various things can work, you have to training institute, find your own voice. Break your points up into logical and easily digestible blocks. For any given block, consider using the three step format: introduction, body, and summary. I think the best advice for an aspiring writer is, to paraphrase H L Mencken, to read widely and to emulate good writing. I like H L Mencken, John Kenneth Galbraith, P J O’Rourke, Mark Steyn, Ursula K Le Guin, and George Will, to name a few. Of Research Proposals? Not what they say, but how they say it – their craftsmanship as writers. Read widely, and when you find someone who writes well, try to see how they do it and borrow the best of their techniques. Essay? Be aware that you aren’t going to get anywhere without effort. Galbraith said that he always wrote six full drafts before publishing anything. The first five drafts were progressively less awful.

Try to of research proposals, get your work published. Essay Australia Vision? There is nothing like working with an editor to raise your game, unless it convinces you that there are easier ways to make a living. Pretty good over all. I disagree with the presumption we have to cooperate with those who would limit ANY of our rights. Types? No gun laws can stand against “shall not be infringed”. It is entirely fallacious to to say there is a reasonable amount of regulation acceptable. A Good Essay? The bill of rights simply says to keep and bear “arms” it does NOT say musket, it does NOT say all but military weapons, there is types proposals, no clause ANYWHERE in the constitution allowing ANY government ANY amount of authority to regulate ANY of the australia rights affirmed by our constitution. Considering the of research proposals document was conceived and written with almost singular purpose and that was to severely limit government.

It nullifies the governments attempts to regulate our right to bear arms or exercise ANY of our God given rights. No need to writing in delhi, repeat omissions already commented on but as others commented, this is far better than I would expect from types, a HS paper. I hope he will take the the psychology comments in jest as well as the advise on their facts. And God damn brass balls to post this to the top ranked pro gun site on the Internet for proposals, critical comments ….i would have wanted to die if anyone but my teacher read anything I wrote at that age, not to mention on a topic that has an entire nation in disagreement. Major kudos to you, Sir. Glad to essay australia vision, have you as a fellow american. First, if he wrote it entirely then kudos, he’s more literate than most teachers. But much of reads although it’s lifted from types, Wikipedia, if not verbatim then switching a few things around.

It just doesn’t flow like one person wrote it straight. Thesis? Pardon me for being suspicious and cynical but I’ve seen too many papers from students that read about 30 IQ points higher than I expected. Second, in of research regards to the concealed carry and gun violence in essay of infidelity general, he ignores the types “threat that the victim may be armed” and the “fear by the criminal that their victim could shoot back” in his assessment. He diminishes the role that gun ownership and control has in romeo and juliet text essay the prevention of crime taking place at proposals all. He also ignores the fact that many of the famous mass gun murders take place in and juliet text essay gun-free zones and how infective restrictions have been. But worst of proposals all, he is coming at the issue from the point of view of regulation rather than defense being a natural right that predates the constitution and the USA. Regulating firearm ownership is a desperate act by a sick society because it assumes that citizens have lost their moral compass and need to be policed. No doubt this is the case in many parts of urban America and some of the meth lab boonies but it’s whole ineffective… the druggies and gangs will always be armed no matter what the essay laws say.

I’m sure it’s an A paper as far as effort goes but he has a long way to go before understanding the issues. As others have mentioned I don’t know if this is supposed to be about the history of gun control or a position paper. I am not happy that David simply uses the of research term “assault weapon” as this is a political term. There are assault weapons. There are assault rifles which are full auto or select fire. He also uses the term gun violence. All types of essay the psychology violence are related. If we are going to reduce violence we need to reduce people’s desire to hurt each other. The role of the paper was twofold; to provide a history of gun control (focusing on types, the 20th century), and australia then to give your opinion on types, the issue based on the evidence previously stated.

I go to a liberal, hoplophobic school outside of Professional D.C. and concluding practically anything beyond “meow meow dangerous black assault rifles are scary and evil and fucking stupid NRA rednecks meow meow meow” was unheard of at the time. When I wrote this paper, I had just began to dip my toe into the abyss of of research gun rights, but I still held on romeo and juliet questions, to some protectionist notions. TTAG has since dispelled these. You go to a school full of types proposals cats? Polite term for kat slang term, LOL! I think I like this kids moxie! 1) The paper misrepresents the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller. Relationship Thesis? Everyone does, which is odd because it’s a short decision, and there isn’t much legalese. In Miller the Court sent the case back to the lower court for fact finding; they did not rule the men were guilty, in effect they held that they didn’t know.

2) Too many assumptions without examining data. If written in 1990, this would have been an excellent paper, but today there is too much data available. It is types of research proposals, not possible to a good, say any gun control idea “might” reduce crime rates, because they all have been tried somewhere and failed. “Unfortunately, not all people who have guns for self defense are sufficiently trained to types, act quickly and australia safely to stop a crime, and their firearms are sometimes used accidentally against innocents.” — Cite your source, kid. That kind of inflammatory statement in an otherwise good essay will count against you. While his analysis is scholarly, he fails to come to the only of research, conclusion that is acceptable. “shall not be infringed” is clear, concise English.

The Bill of Rights establishes that there are certain, fundamental rights that cannot be abridged. But that collective enumeration goes further than specifics – it documents that there are fundamental rights not enumerated that are nonetheless fundamental. The very idea that the Constitution and its Bill of Rights do not cement inviolable principles in law, and that such principles are elastic and subject to the political circumstances of the the psychology times, is fallacious. That concept invalidates THE keystone of this republic, i.e., that there are unalienable rights endowed by types proposals, a higher authority than men that CANNOT be intruded upon, no matter what percentage of the people can be convinced that they should be. And that is at and juliet text essay the center of this so-called ‘debate’. It is types of research, not guns. It is liberty. It is the very definition of what America IS. A+ for the analysis of the status quo.

F for failing to reach the only conclusion supported by the evidence, namely, that there can BE no ‘debate’ of the future of the relationship people’s right to types proposals, arms, because it is transcendent. Overall, a pretty decent job from the historic analysis standpoint, … but: David left out the key legal document from the founding of the USA: The Declaration of Independence. The Declaration sets the Professional Development-Education context for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, since they were both written by the same people, the same revolutionaries who fought for liberty and independence from Great Britain. The Declaration lists many unalienable Rights, including the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of proposals happiness. But there is only one DUTY described in that Declaration. You will find that Duty about halfway through the essay of infidelity second paragraph of the of research Declaration. “But when a long Train of Abuses and a good essay Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their DUTY, to of research, throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” That is the relationship context for the Second Amendment’s Right to keep and bear arms. It is not hunting, it is not target shooting, it is of research proposals, not trap shooting – it is to fulfill our duty, as free citizens (not subjects) to ensure the preservation of individual liberty for essay, ourselves and future generations, and to prevent our central government from becoming an “absolute Despotism”. The men who fought and died in the Revolution clearly understood that Duty.

That Duty is types proposals, not served by firearms suitable for “sporting purposes”, or hunting, or trap shooting. It is Professional, served by civilian versions of the same infantry firearms used by our military. And to help David understand the of research proposals meaning of “shall not be infringed”, try putting two 6-year old kids in the back seat of Development-Education a car, run a strip of types masking tape down the romeo and juliet text middle of the seat, tell them “stay on your own side”, and take a 4-hour road trip. Those 6-year olds will be able to provide you with a very precise accounting of any “infringement” of their rights to the car seat. Why is that word so difficult to understand when it is types of research proposals, used in essay vision the Second Amendment? well researched. I am sure it got an “A” from a teacher.

Teachers grade on technical aspects of writing and do not on the accuracy of the of research conclusion, they can’t be an essay of infidelity, expert on every subject. Just one point, the “debate about evolving language”? The founders didn’t mean for it to “evolve”; that’s why they wrote it down. Fourth, straw purchasing, where someone who is prohibited from possessing a firearm uses a surrogate buyer to act for them. This statement is incorrect. According to the recent SCOTUS decision in the Abramski case, a straw purchase is when any surrogate buys a gun for another person, whether or not the proposals other person is prohibited. An exception is made for buying a gun as a gift for a non-prohibited person. It’s a decent paper, especially for a High School student.

However, I would direct his attention to Title 10, Section 311 of the essay U.S. Code, which covers what a militia is: (a)The militia of the proposals United States consists of Professional all able-bodied males at least 17 years of types of research proposals age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the reflection essay United States who are members of the National Guard. (b)The classes of the militia are— (1)the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and proposals the Naval Militia; and. (2)the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the Professional Development-Education militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. An examination of the Militia Acts is of research, probably warranted, since everything else about the gun control debate is relationship thesis, a distraction from the fact that these definitions are already codified into types of research the supreme law of the land.

Focus on the good points! “From the smoothbore muskets wielded by farmers in the Revolutionary War, to the M1 Garands carried by the valiant soldiers of the U.S. Essay? Military in WWII, to the 5.56x45mm rounds being sent “downrange” from the barrels of M4s and types of research proposals M16s in Afghanistan as this is being written, guns were a necessary part in the creation of reflection our nation and continue to play an important role in protecting America abroad. But civilian ownership of guns in America is a dividing issue.” Seemed that the author was pushing for the military view of the 2nd. “What is a militia?

Who are “the people?” Many questions arise after reading the text. Those in favor of gun control tend to of research proposals, believe that the thesis Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms as a collective right, meaning one reserved for types proposals, the military. Those who support gun rights believe that the Second Amendment is meant to protect the right of individuals to bear arms.” How about some quotes from the founding fathers? Such as: “A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and response essay ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” — George Washington. “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and of research bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny in government.” – Thomas Jefferson. “No free men shall be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson. “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in relationship almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for types, they will possess the the psychology of infidelity power, and proposals jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.” — Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution [1787] “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the a good reflection people themselves. Of Research Proposals? …To preserve liberty, it is a good, essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” — Richard Henry Lee. “A government that does not trust it’s law abiding citizens to types of research proposals, keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust.” – James Madison.

“The great object is that every man be armed. . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun. . . . Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense?” – Patrick Henry. As for the Miller decision, there was no real defense presented. Australia? There was a history of military use of short barreled shotguns (which is types proposals, not what they should have based their decision on) prior to the arrest and Development-Education court cases. In all fairness Robert, unfortunately sometimes writing a paper like this for class is as much about writing a good paper and expressing your opinion as it is types, about tailoring it to your teachers sentiments and walking a fine line between achieving both. Paper seemed good though overall very factual with questions put in for romeo and juliet response questions, the reader to ask of themselves.

Without knowing the specific assignment and types of research the length restrictions, I think getting into some underlying philosophy would liven it up a bit.